ITEM 1 – ASSIGNMENT TASK. Page 1-3
ITEM 2 – INSTRUCTIONS. Page 4
ITEM 1 – TASK
Assessment item 3
Validation phase
Value: 40%
Length: Word length1400-2000
Submission method options
Task
In this assignment, you are required to complete the following two parts (A & B) to validate your system designs.
Part A (75%):
You have the following two choices to develop detailed object-oriented design models. You also need to submit a proper documentation describing the different aspect of developed component, within 2000 words.
Task 1: The students who have expertise in object-oriented programming are required to validate their system design through developing a prototype for at least one subsystem of chosen case study. You have an option to use any object-oriented programming language such as C++, Java, C#, etc. to develop this subsystem.
OR
Task 2: The students who have no expertise in object-oriented programming are required to validate their system design using interaction diagrams (i.e., communication diagrams or sequence diagrams) for at least one subsystem of chosen case study. To do this, identify 3 (three) most important use cases for the subsystem and develop communication diagrams or sequence diagrams for these use cases.
Part B (25%):
For this task you have to demonstrate your developed object-oriented model in front of audience (online) using PowerPoint presentation.
Rationale
The purpose of this assessment task is to develop student’s skills and knowledge in :
• validating an OO design through the construction of a prototype
• converting design diagrams into program code
• preparing project documentation
• developing presentations, and through peer review to reflect on their own practice and improve their design.
This assessment item links to the learning outcomes (LO) 1,2,3,4,5 and 6.
Marking criteria
Criteria
HD
DI
CR
PS
FL
Part A (60%)
Task 1: The students who have expertise in object-oriented programming are required to validate their system design through developing a prototype for at least one subsystem of chosen case study. You have an option to use any object-oriented programming language such as C++, Java, C#, etc. to develop this subsystem.
OR
Task 2: The students who have no expertise in object-oriented programming are required to validate their system design using interaction diagrams (i.e., communication diagrams or sequence diagrams) for at least one subsystem of chosen case study. To do this, identify all possible use cases for the subsystem and develop communication diagrams or sequence diagrams for these use cases.
Task 1:
Fully functional prototype using major principles of object-oriented programming such as encapsulation, data abstraction, polymorphism and inheritance. Each variable, function/method, loops, if/else statements, etc are well commented.
OR
Task 2:
All possible use cases of the subsystem are identified; developed communication or sequence diagrams are correctly showing logical flow of the system activities, input/output messages, and accurate symbols/notations.
Task 1:
Mostly fully functional prototype using major principles of object-oriented programming such as encapsulation, data abstraction, polymorphism and inheritance. Each variable, function/method, loops, if/else statements, etc are well commented.
OR
Task 2:
Major use cases of the subsystem are identified; developed communication or sequence diagrams are correctly showing logical flow of the system activities, input/output messages, and accurate symbols/notations.
Task 1:
Mostly fully functional prototype using major principles of object-oriented programming such as encapsulation, data abstraction, polymorphism and inheritance. Each variable, function/method, loops, if/else statements, etc are well commented.
Minor omission only
OR
Task 2:
Major use cases of the subsystem are identified; developed communication or sequence diagrams are correctly showing logical flow of the system activities, input/output messages, and accurate symbols/notations.
Minor omission only
Task 1:
Prototype not always functional using major principles of object-oriented programming such as encapsulation, data abstraction, polymorphism and inheritance. Each variable, function/method, loops, if/else statements, etc are not well commented.
OR
Task 2:
Some use cases of the subsystem are identified; developed communication or sequence diagrams are mostly correct showing logical flow of the system activities, input/output messages, and accurate symbols/notations.
Task 1:
Prototype has major errors and not working.
OR
Task 2:
Few use cases of the subsystem are identified; developed communication or sequence diagrams are wrong.
Part A (15%)
Task 1 & Task 2
Submit a proper documentation describing the different aspect of developed component, within 2000 words.
Task 1 & Task 2:
Comprehensive documentation which describes each component of developed system and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the case study.
Task 1 & Task 2:
Mostly comprehensive documentation which describes each component of developed system and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the case study.
Task 1 & Task 2:
Mostly comprehensive documentation which describes each component of developed system and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the case study.
Minor emission only
Task 1 & Task 2:
Reasonable documentation describes few components of developed system.
Task 1 & Task 2:
Documentation is wrong and not matching with system components.
Part B (25%):
For this task you have to demonstrate your developed object-oriented model in front of audience (online) using PowerPoint presentation.
Presentation is outstanding and clearly expressed all major elements of presentation including steps/design explained and justified, discussion of technical aspects of the project, and quality of presentation (e.g., introduction, name of presenter, title, outline, visual aids (text style and size, colour combination, etc), and clear voice of presenter, finally conclusion summarised main points.
Presentation is mostly accurate and clearly expressed all major elements of presentation including steps/design explained and justified, discussion of technical aspects of the project, and quality of presentation (e.g., introduction, name of presenter, title, outline, visual aids (text style and size, colour combination, etc), and clear voice of presenter, finally conclusion summarised main points.
Presentation is mostly accurate and clearly expressed all major elements of presentation including steps/design explained and justified, discussion of technical aspects of the project, and quality of presentation (e.g., introduction, name of presenter, title, outline, visual aids (text style and size, colour combination, etc), and clear voice of presenter, finally conclusion summarised main points.
Minor omission.
Overall, presentation is good but not clearly expressed all major elements of presentation including steps/design explained and justified, discussion of technical aspects of the project, and quality of presentation (e.g., introduction, name of presenter, title, outline, visual aids (text style and size, colour combination, etc), and clear voice of presenter, finally conclusion summarised main points.
Incomplete presentation with very little information about the system design.
Presentation
Reports should be submitted is MS Word format, using the CSU referencing style of APA.
Diagrams can be created using any available tools.
Requirements
Students should visit and read the CSU Referencing Policy at http://student.csu.edu.a
ITEM 2 – INSTRUCTIONS
This assignment will be, PART A – TASK 2 and PART B
Part A (75%):
You have the following two choices to develop detailed object-oriented design models. You also need to submit a proper documentation describing the different aspect of developed component, within 1500 words.
Task 2: The students who have no expertise in object-oriented programming are required to validate their system design using interaction diagrams (i.e., communication diagrams or sequence diagrams) for at least one subsystem of chosen case study. To do this, identify 3 (three) most important use cases for the subsystem and develop communication diagrams or sequence diagrams for these use cases.
Part B (25%):
For this task you have to demonstrate your developed object-oriented model in front of audience (online) using PowerPoint presentation.
TASK 2 Requirements: Identify 3 most important use cases for the subsystem
SUBSYSTEM = Operational System
3 uses cases = 1. Entry to the Car park, 2. Payment, 3. Leaving the Car Park
Each use cases needs a user case and sequence diagram (Please reference sample of assignment 3 PDF
Please provide all diagrams in Visio file as well. UML Use Case and UML Sequence Diagrams can you please provide file in Visio.
I have also attached the following files:
CASE STUDY for TASK 2 – ITC508 Case Study 1.PDF
This is the case study that will be used for this assignment
Sample of assessment item 3.PDF
Please reference Part A, Tasks 2.
You will need to provide for each of the three use cases
UML Use Case Diagram – Page 7
Functional Test Case table – Page 7, 8
UML Sequence Diagram – Page 9
Overview write up of the use case – Page 2
DOC
Page 9 is the USE CASE diagram of the whole system
Our Service Charter
-
Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free
We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers. -
Free Revisions
We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed. -
Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure
We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service. -
Money Back Guarantee
If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit. -
24/7 Customer Support
We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.