WE WRITE CUSTOM ACADEMIC PAPERS

100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Tailored to your instructions

Order Now!

 
READING LIST for Retail Purchasing and Supply Chain Management:     
 
Essential Texts

Baily, P., D. Farmer, B. Crocker, D. Jessop & D. Jones (2015) Procurement Principles and Management, 11th London: Pearson
Christopher, M. (2016) Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 5th London: Financial Times/Pearson Education
Lysons, K; B Farrington (2012) Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 8th London: FT Prentice Hall
Cash, R.P., C.Thomas, J.W. Wingate, J.S. Friedlander (2006). Management of Retail Buying. Hoboken: Wiley
Fernie, J. and L. Sparks (2009) Logistics and Retail Management, London: Kogan Page
Hill, A. and T. Hill (2011) Essential Operations Management, Hampshire: Palgrave  Macmillan
Hugos, M. & C. Thomas (2006) Supply Chain Management in the Retail Industry, Hoboken: Wiley
Kent, T. & O. Omar (2003) Retailing, Hampshire: Palgrave  Macmillan
McGoldrick, P. (2002) Retail Marketing, Maidenhead: McGraw Hill
Varley, R. (2014) Retail Product Management, Buying and Merchandising, London: Routledge

 
 
Recommended Reading
 

Diamond, J., and G. Pintel (2007) Retail Buying, London: Prentice Hall Intl.
Fawcett, P., R. McLeish and I. Ogden (1998) Logistics Management, London:  FT Prentice Hall
Fernie, J. and S. Fernie C. Moore (2004) Principles of Retailing, Oxford: Elsevier
Gattorna, J.L. and D.W. Walters (1996) Managing the Supply Chain, Basingstoke: Macmillan
Mangan, J., C. Lalwani, T. Butcher and R. Japour (2012) Global Logistics & Supply Chain
Management, 2nd Chichester: Wiley.
Pullman, M., and Z. Wu. (2012) Food Supply Chain Management, New York: Routledge
Saunders, M. (1997) Strategic Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, London: Pitman
Varley, R. and M. Rafiq (2004) Principles of Retail Management, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan

 
 
Journals
 

International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management
International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research
Journal of Retailing

 
 
Indicative Web Sites
 

Retail Bulletin (theretailbulletin.com)
Retail Week  (http://info.retail-week.com)
Drapers (http://www.drapersonline.com)
The Grocer (http://www.thegrocer.co.uk)
The retail Analysis (http://www.igd.com)
Retail / commercial Internet sites

 
Assessment Brief

Academic year and term:
2016/17 – Semester Two

Module title:
Retail: Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

Module code:
 

Module Convener:
 

Learning outcomes assessed within this piece of work as agreed at the programme level meeting
1.                   Understand the role of purchasing and supply in retail organisations;
2.                   Evaluate the main components of purchasing and supply chains and critically analyse the management implications;
3.                   Evaluate the sourcing and supply requirements of retailing organisations;
4.                   Critically evaluate the financial implications of purchasing and supply decisions;
5.                   Debate the concepts involved in purchasing selection with relation to the marketing of retail organisations;
6.                   Demonstrate knowledge and skill of negotiation procedures in procurement;
7.                   Critically evaluate theoretical models and concepts of purchasing and supply within the UK retail sector ;
8.                  Appreciate the significance of the role of ethical sourcing and corporate social responsibility in purchasing and supply.

Type of assessment:           
Written essay

Assessment deadline:
t.b.c.

Instructions for assessment
Assignment: Purchasing and Supply Chain Essay (100%)
Deadline:  TBC
 
The retail landscape is changing more rapidly than ever before, driven by uncertainties in global economics, the emergence of new technologies and increasingly complex demands from customers […] The companies best placed to increase market share at the expense of their competitors will be those who can provide customers what they want, when they want it and how they want to buy it. That means providing a seamless front-end customer experience, together with an agile and optimised supply chain behind the scenes.
IGD (2014)
 
 
 
Critically discuss how supermarket retailers meet the needs of the market.
Evaluate features of their assortment planning, own brand and supply chain operations that contribute to their success.
Give specific attention to purchasing decisions, distribution systems, inventory management and customer service.
 
 
The essay should be 2000 words in length and be set out in an essay style (continuous prose).
Give enough attention to areas that will you will be specifically marked against:
 
 
Marking Scheme
Breadth and relevance of research                                              35%
Level of analysis/application of theory                                       35%
Conclusions (and recommendations)                                         20 %
Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing                         10%
 
Reference
IGD (2014) Winning in supply chain’s new world [online] Available at: [Accessed 31st December 2015]
How will we support you with your assessment?

A dedicated seminar in week six
Assessment briefing in lectures 1, 6 and 10
Formative feedback on seminar activities
Links to the assessment throughout your seminars and team-building session specifically
Assignment hand-in checklist
Coursework tutorials

How will your work be assessed?
Your work will be assessed by a subject expert who will use the marking grid provided in this assessment brief.  When you access your marked work it is important that you reflect on the feedback so that you can use it to improve future assignments.
Referencing
You MUST use the Harvard System.  The Harvard system is very easy to use once you become familiar with it.
Assignment submissions
The Business School requires a digital version of all assignment submissions.  These must be submitted via Turnitin on the module’s Moodle site.  They must be submitted as a Word file (not as a pdf) and must not include scanned in text or text boxes.  They must be submitted by 2pm on the given date.  For further general details on coursework preparation refer to the online information via
Mitigating circumstances/what to do if you cannot submit a piece of work or attend your presentation
The University Mitigating Circumstances Policy can be found on the University website
 
Marking and feedback process
Between you handing in your work and then receiving your feedback and marks within 20 days, there are a number of quality assurance processes that we go through to ensure that students receive marks which reflects their work. A brief summary is provided below.

Step One – The module and marking team meet to agree standards, expectations and how feedback will be provided.
Step Two – A subject expert will mark your work using the criteria provided in the assessment brief.
Step Three – A moderation meeting takes place where all members of the teaching and marking team will review the marking of others to confirm whether they agree with the mark and feedback
Step Four – Work at Levels 5 and 6 then goes to an external examiner who will review a sample of work to confirm that the marking between different staff is consistent and fair
Stop Five – Your mark and feedback is processed by the Office and made available to you.

Rubric for “Retail: Purchasing and Supply Chain Management” Module
 

85-100 – 85.00
70-85 – 75.00
60-69 – 65.00
50-59 – 55.00
40-49 – 45.00
30 – 39 – 35.00
0 – 29 – 20.00
0

Research – 35%
Breadth and relevance of research:
Research includes retail journals, core and essential text books from the reading list and web sources including market reports.
Breadth and relevance of research:
Research includes retail journals, core and essential text books from the reading list and web sources (usually including market reports).
Breadth and relevance of research:
Research includes some academic journals and text books from the reading list. Scope for more breadth though
Breadth and relevance of research:
Research includes competent attempt at one or two academic journals, text books and online sources. More breadth needed.
Breadth and relevance of research:
Limited research often not including academic journals and text books.
Breadth and relevance of research:
Little attempt made at researching the topic using texts, academic journals and online sources.
Breadth and relevance of research:
Little attempt made at researching the topic using texts, academic journals and online sources
Breadth and relevance of research:
No attempt made at researching the topic using texts, academic journals and online sources

Analysis – 35%
Level of analysis/ application of theory:
Outstanding analysis relating to the question. Analysis is always supported by academic theory.
Level of analysis/ application of theory:
Excellent analysis relating to the question. Analysis is supported by academic theory well.
Level of analysis/ application of theory:
Good analysis relating to the question. Most analysis is supported by academic theory.
Level of analysis/ application of theory:
A general analysis sometimes related to the question. Key issues are loosely mentioned and the correct application of academic theory is limited.
Level of analysis/ application of theory:
A weak analysis occasionally related to the question. Application of academic theory is extremely limited.
Level of analysis/ application of theory:
Assignment covers some answers to the questions set but lacks focus. Application to academic theory is limited.
Level of analysis/ application of theory:
Assignment covers some answers to the questions set but lacks focus. Application to academic theory is limited.
Level of analysis/ application of theory:
Assignment struggles to answer the actual question set. It is barely on topic and lacks application to academic theory to support points.

Conclusions – 20%

Conclusions:
Outstandingly clear concluding comments encompassing key points made.
Conclusions:
Excellent concluding comments encompassing key points made
Conclusions:
Good concluding comments encompassing key points made.
Conclusions:
Limited but satisfactory concluding comments offered which attempt to close the essay.
Conclusions:
Some basic conclusions drawn from the work but no real summary offered.
Conclusions:
Limited conclusions drawn, and often reader has to find these within the work.
Conclusions:
No conclusions drawn.
Conclusions:
None provided

Structure – 10%
Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:
Writing style is clear and concise.  Assignment is written with an academic tone and well-structured. Grammar and punctuation are outstanding and Harvard referencing and citation style is correct.
Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:
Writing style is clear. Assignment is written with an academic tone and well-structured. Grammar and punctuation are generally excellent and Harvard referencing and citation style is mostly correct
Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:
Writing style is clear and points are fairly well made. Assignment has attempted to use an academic tone. Grammar and punctuation are good and Harvard referencing and citation style is mostly correct. Some structural issues may be apparent.
Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:
Writing style is competent but more work needed on ensuring the structure is suitable and that points are well communicated. Harvard referencing needs improvement.
Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:
Writing style is quite difficult to follow and structural issues apparent. More effort needed on writing with an academic tone and grammar and punctuation could be improved. Harvard referencing needs improvement.
Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:
Writing style is difficult to read and understand. Poor attempt at correctly referencing using the Harvard style. Haphazard structure of assignment.
Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:
Writing style is difficult to read and understand. No attempt at correctly referencing using the Harvard style. Haphazard structure of assignment.
Clarity, structure, grammar, correct referencing:
None evident

 
 
 

Our Service Charter

  1. Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free

    We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
  2. Free Revisions

    We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
  3. Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure

    We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
  4. Money Back Guarantee

    If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.
  5. 24/7 Customer Support

    We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.

Excellent Quality
Zero Plagiarism
Expert Writers

Instant Quote

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency (Less urgent, less costly):
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost: NaN

Get 10% Off on your 1st order!