With the emergence of globalization and the subsequent growth of world economies, the upsurge in human population and the more need for interpersonal and organizational communication, people seem to interact more and more. Most of these interactions take place at work places. Due to diversity of human nature and the growing need for interaction so as to help come up with decisions and policies, conflicts at work places have become common phenomena (Palmer, p 4).
Definition of conflict
As observed by (Rahim, p15) conflict as a word does not have a very clear way of defining it. The difference in defining it comes as a result of different definitions of the word from different scholars in varying fields of study who have a desire to study conflict. However, all different definitions are accepted so long as one clearly specifies the subject or field of study under which he or she if defining it.
The definition according to the organizational context is that conflict is a leakage or a disruption in the standard channels of making decisions in the organization which hinders the choice of alternative options by either individuals or groups. It is however argued that this definition does not suit to be used in research as it narrows down the concept (Rahim, p15).
Conflict could also be explained as an activity that happens between two people who have conscious minds and are logical in thinking. A conflict is an event that happens when a number of people wish to pursue something, but they fail to have a common stand on how to do it. The definition of conflict is nonetheless not strictly attached to individuals or groups but it can also be applied to bigger entities like states (Nicholson, p 11).
Conflict can also be defined as disagreement that comes from either individuals or groups as a result of varying opinions, differing needs and attitudes, perception and values. Conflict results when these groups or individuals come up with varying and opposing stand on a similar subject (Walker and Miller p 378).
Reasons of conflicts
Conflicts in organizations or at work places arise due to numerous reasons. At the center of working with others lies conflict the causes of conflicts just like the results of conflicts vary. In organizations or workplaces, relations between individuals or groups matter a lot. It is these relations that stand to determine whether the organization runs smoothly or not.
We currently live in an uncertain economy that is characterized with competition for both market and promotion, loyalties that are mostly misplaced, blame game and pointing of fingers and stress and depression that result from work pressures. All these stand in interaction to cause conflicts at work places. It is however believed that the heterogeneity of people stands to be a universal genesis of conflict in companies. As people work together, disagreement over decisions is inevitable. These differences come to play when setting goals, formulating objectives, making policies and in the strife to attain or achieve these goals and objectives (Psychometrics, para 2)
In a study that was carried out in Canada about experiences of conflict at workplace having been triggered by the studies done in the United States and United Kingdom, causes of conflicts were rated in percentages. With the leading percentage of 86% were personality problems. This was followed by poor leadership and management at 73%. Third, was the communication problem at 67% followed by workplace generated stress with 64% lastly, came conflict over values with 59% (Psychometrics, para 3).
A majority of employees tend to share same views on what causes conflicts at workplaces. They argue that conflicts depart from certain major attributes among them the aspect of leadership in organizations, differing personalities, communication patterns and the environment at work.
Personality diversity is seen as the major reason for conflicts between and among workers. It is too hard to integrate the divergent personalities from different people. Different personalities are accompanied by different egos thus a clash of egos becomes eminent (Landskroner, p 218).
According to (Walker and Miller p. 382) there are many reasons why there are employee conflicts at places of work. These are lack of or proper communication, poor defining of roles and duties by the management and low esteem by employees resulting from the notion of undervaluation.
Communication plays a very big role in ensuring that the organization runs smoothly. Communication itself is a very delicate and complicated phenomenon. Absence of honesty and openness amongst employees which is perceived to emanate from work related stress causes clashes between employees thus conflict (Walker and Miller p. 382)
Lack of good leadership also plays a big role in bringing conflicts at the workplace. When the top management of companies comes up with policies that do not foster good relations in the organization, conflicts become unavoidable. However, it is harsh to define what good leadership itself is (Walker and Miller p. 382)
Speedy pace of business is one of the major causes of conflict. Too much pressure is put on employees to suit the bulging needs of companies or businesses for instance the need to increase production to meet the rising demand. Such pressure stressing up employing resulting in tampers thus creating a favorable environment for conflicts (Wenger and Mockli, p 4).
Competition has become a common case in business due to diversity in consumption patterns, advancement in technology and globalization. Organizations works to tailor make their products, thus the need to diversify operations of organizations in order to maximize their profits. Diversification affects the mutual working patterns and relations resulting in conflicts in organizations (Wenger and Mockli p 4).
Also organizations nowadays keep altering and shifting the working environment. This is because modern time is characterized by merging of functions, acquisitions, maximization of sales and expansion of operations that is accompanied with opening of newer enterprises. All these are positive but the pressures that come with them are sometimes too high to be managed resulting in conflict (Eisaguirre, p 13).
Sources of conflict
here almost a blurred line between the causes of employee conflict and the sources of conflicts in organization or companies. However it should be understood that it is reasons that culminate into causes. The sources of conflict could be structural, or economic related. It could also be social, psychological or cultural. An individual and the organization are the two broad sources of conflicts (Stretton, p 25).
Personal qualities of an individual which is shaped by many factors are sources of conflicts. Many people differ in terms of age, sex, gender, religious affiliations, manner of communicating and even personal motivations. All these interact and the result of their interaction is conflict.(Burke and Friedman, p 54).
In organizations, the most common cause of conflict is inadequate resources. The need to use the fewer available resources to satisfy demands of competing ends result in work pressures leading to wrangles. This is an organizational problem that results in other pressures which brings turmoil at places of work (Burke and Friedman, p 54).
Power is a very important element in any organization. In fact it is argued that the source of many conflicts between employees in organizations is power. It is very hard to find an organization where power has been equally distributed across the organization. This is because power comes from major three sources mentioned as structure, knowledge and the culture. Power creates dependency that makes some people have power to influence others. If not well managed, power which gives one person an upper hand of influencing the outcome of events could lead to constant confrontations and put in tatters the good patterns of relations (Bacal, p 20).
Age in the modern times has come to be a very concrete debate in politics. Age has polarized the world population into the old and the youths. Age has resulted in discrimination in organizations where the old oppose the young and vice versa. All these employees exist in organization and because they are at loggerheads with each other, conflict becomes inevitable (Kunisch, Sven, Boehm, and Boppel, p 79)
Goal and goal setting is an origin of conflicts in the organization. There are different types of goals namely content, process, and relational and identity goals. Failure to understand and act according to the need of each individual goals could cause many misunderstands (Collins and O’Rourke, p 8)
Sex and gender issues have in the recent past been a source of employee conflicts. It is nowadays common to hear spouses conflicting because of relations at the workplace for instance you may hear that a boss has sex relations with an employee. When these conflicts spill over to the public, it is too hard to contain them. They even go a way out to cause breakage of marriages and engagements. Gender stereotyping also cause numerous conflicts (Barret, p 232).
When organizations fail to clearly define roles and responsibilities, there will be a likelihood of a conflict to happen. In such a case, decisions are reached upon in a hap hazard manner. Such decisions easily escalate to conflicts at the workplace ( Straesser, p 21).
Intrapersonal factors have ability to cause serious conflicts. An example is stress and depression. Stress can originate from either at home at the place where people work. Stress makes an individual to act irrationally. It interferes with a person’s use of good skills either at home or at where one works.(Goldman, p 328).
Symptoms of conflicts
The indicators of failing to resolve conflicts cost organizations more. In most cases, conflicts are liabilities to the organization.
It may not be easy for an outsider to know when and if an organization is experiencing conflicts. However, there are some trends or patterns of behavior that may make one deduce that a conflict is in an organization. These include workers avoiding one another, bad – mouthing amongst employees, disintegration of groups or teams, and discrimination of individuals or groups and absenteeism (Collins and O’Rourke, p 2).
When employees are in conflict, the patterns of relations change. The employees who are in conflict will want not to come face to face or in contact with one another. They keep avoiding each other even if they work in a similar department. Such tension destabilizes the functioning of the organization and aggravates conflicts (Collins and O’Rourke, p 2)
When things are not moving well in at the work place, employees would like to gossip about these deep seated issues therefore these are indicative of a conflict in the organization.
Conflicts in organizations are characterized by disintegration of groups. It becomes very hard for people to work as a team whenever workers are in conflict with either the management or with other workers (Collins and O’Rourke, p 3)
Components of conflicts
For a conflict to take place there has to be more than a single party. This is the first component of conflict that arises from the definition of the term itself. However, this component seems to ignore intrapersonal conflicts from which most conflicts originate (Scannell, p 2).
There has to be incompatibility in terms of ideas, beliefs, actions, objectives and goals. For there to be a conflict, there has to be opposing views over something or someone (Scannell, p. 2).
In conflicting situations, the sides which oppose one another see their options as the best suited to offer the best solution. People work to maximize the adoption of their ideas (Scannell, p 2).
Organizations that experience conflict mostly have higher rates of performance. Certain conflict types may affect the performance of groups or organizations positively. These fall under substantive conflicts. More often, such conflicts are related to differing opinions duties, policies and other issues related to business (Scannell, p 3).
Effects of conflicts
The effects of conflicts can be categorized into three; first order, second order and third order effects. In the first order, the effects can be easily quantified. The consequences of a conflict are readily determined. In the second category, the effects may not necessarily relate directly to the original conflict. In the third category, the effects are too hard or impossible to scale (Route and Omiko, p 245)
Conflicts between or among employees in any given organization comes with numerous consequences some of which may be positive while others may be negative. In organizations, the conflicts have a number of outcomes which include excessive worker turnover, deficient morale, decline in production, tampering of quality of products, failure to honor tenders due to employees’ laxity in production and stricter supervision (Route and Omiko, p 246)
According to the center for conflict resolution international, the consequences of conflicts at places of work can reach devastating levels either to the partakers in the conflict or to colleagues of those involved in conflict and to clients and the whole business at large. The consequences of conflicts at work place include mental conditions like stress, anxiety or even in some cases insomnia. Others are strained relationships, reduced production, rise in employee turnover rate, client dissatisfaction, habitual absenteeism cases and increased grievances from employees and subsequent litigation (Center for conflict resolution international, para. 2)
Failure to resolve conflicts reduces output of employees in any given organization. It is however important to note that this impact of conflict is always ignored or unrecognized. Employees who work under high pressure or whose efforts are not rewarded have a higher risk of developing physical and mental disorders. Such employees easily develop mental disorders. Due to the rising cases of conflicts at workplaces, more and more people are reported to seek for help to help them manage conditions that originate from the conflicts. Psychologically inclined reasons that are linked to or reflective of the environment under which people work (Center for conflict resolution international, para 3)
Work related conflicts have had a spill over effect to the social and family life. Depression coming from employee conflict has led to cases like suicide, alcoholism and drug abuse, verbal abuse, domestic violence among many other vices. Some families have had to separate or even break because of these reasons (Center for conflict resolution international, para 3)
Types of conflicts
Conflicts that exist at places of work have two broad dimensions. The first one is the employee – employee conflict while the second dimensions the employee management conflict.
Classifying of conflicts is done differently by different conflicts. Most classification of conflicts are based the causal factors.
There exist two types of conflicts. The first type is called substantive conflict while the second type is called personality- inclined conflict. Substantive conflicts arise from specific problems which lie at the center of the problem. They can be controlled or managed only by addressing the specific problem. For instance when two or more employees compete over the use of a resource like a printer in an organization, a conflict is likely to happen. Personality conflicts arise from individuals and individual characters and characteristic in interaction with one another (Rau-Foster, para 10)
Another classification puts breaks conflicts into different types. These types are organized conflicts, unorganized conflicts, perceived conflict, line – staff conflict, latent conflict and manifest conflict (Goel, p 209).
Organized conflicts and unorganized conflicts are put into one class. An instance of organized conflict is the conflict between the top leadership of an organization and the employees union. Such a conflict is expressed when the competing parties chooses to counter each other. When the option of countering and battling one another seem not to bear result, the parties may turn to use unorganized conflict like absenting themselves, strikes, go slows among others(Goel, p 209).
When a conflict is perceived in an organization, a lot of pressure and tensions develop in the organization. The perception may be wright or wrong but it becomes a potential ground for conflict. This is what is referred to as perceived conflict (Goel, p 209).
Line staff conflict happens due to the presence of people to manage line and staff activities. Line managers see themselves as being superior to the staff managers hence a conflict becomes imminent (Goel, p 209).
Latent conflict is an almost invisible conflict because the conflicting parties do not show it in open
Manifest conflict is the opposite of latent conflict. Here, parties express themselves in an open manner. It can also be called open conflict (Goel, p 209).
Employee-manager conflicts
This is a unique form of conflict because parties to the conflict have different power and status because they are in different positions.
These conflicts arise in organizations mostly because of organizational policies that are developed by the management. They mostly happen in top – down organizations. In an attempt to enforce organizational rules and policies, the management most of the time find themselves in conflict with workers (Ting-Toomey and John p 138).
Managers may also possess bad characters and poor communication skills. Vices like favoritism by bosses, ignorance, lack of appraisals, dictatorship, lack of respect and the use of course language on employees are among things that may put employees at loggerheads with their managers. These conflicts arise mostly what can be termed as ineffective or unfavorable policies most of which employees object to (Ting-Toomey and John, p. 138).
Conflicts between employees
Conflict between employees is a common form of conflict. There are many reasons as to why these conflicts are more common. However, it is important ton note that most of these originate from personalities and issues of teamwork. For them to work and achieve the set goals and targets there has to be a lot of cohesiveness. However, achieving this is quite hard due to differing personalities, characters and interests of people (Monberg, p 40)
Avoidance of conflict
The importance of conflict avoidance at work place using social norm has been emphasized by social psychologists. However with the increasing diversity of human populations and changing nature of work environments, conflict becomes an inevitable phenomenon. In the modern Human Resource Management era, conflicts are managed using conflict resolution as a basic tool (Hirsch, p 289).
A number of scholars have developed strategies that can help avoid conflicts; the absorption of these strategies into organization and groups is very hard.
Definition of conflict resolution
Conflict resolution is a common term in modern management. Interactions in modern society come with a lot of challenges that make conflict a very common thing. When conflicts happen, there are four options to take. They are ignoring, avoiding, confronting or resolving. The last one is considered as the best approach (Wandberg, p 22).
Conflict resolution can be defined as a process of minimizing or calming conflicts so as to avoid the worst consequences from happening. These consequences may harm people or their property. In organizations, when employees conflict, they may harm one another either physically, emotionally or socially. Conflict at work place may also harm the business (Wandberg, p 22).
Conflict resolution skills
As conflict is almost inevitable, organizations – management and employees have to know how they should deal with them to avoid catastrophes. There is a growing need for the management of organizations to have skills on resolving conflicts at their fingertips.
There are different forms of conflict resolution methods that can be adopted to help resolve conflicts at the workplace. They include mediation, negotiation, arbitration, conciliation and litigation. For one to adopt any of these, he or she must have knowledge of it including how to use it as each method best suit a particular conflict in question (Doherty and Guyler, p 50).
A general approach to solving any conflict including understanding each others views, identifying underlying issues, seeking for potential options of addressing the issues, understanding the consequence that is posed by each option, choosing best alternatives and developing mechanisms to resolve the conflict (Hess, Orthmann, LaDue and Bennett, p 391).
Tips to conflict resolution
All forms of interactions have conflicts. To resolve any conflict, one has to have an open mind. In conflict resolution there are three probable outcomes which are win – win, win some – loose some, win – loose and loose – loose. One has to really understand what conflict resolution is – its purpose and how to go about it (Sears, Rudisill and Mason-Sears, p 109).
In conflict resolution, compromise is more desired as compared to avoidance or competition. In compromise, each side is expected to make concessions. For instance in a dispute over salary, the workers may be expected to lower the figures while the management is expected to raise the figure in order to reach a rational and amicable figure that is sustainable to both (Davidson, p 41).
When resolving a conflict it is advisable to be selfless. One is advised not to dominate his mind with thoughts about himself or herself. This is called caring counts. One is expected to be ready to accept apologies and make concessions (Davidson, p 41).
One must work as hard as possible to minimize personal generated stress which may interfere with sober judgments (Davidson, p 41).
Things to avoid in conflict resolution
There are some attributes of and individuals that work negatively in conflict resolution ad therefore they should be avoided.
Denial is one of them. This is where a party to the conflict refuses to accept that a problem exists. Denial blocks any efforts to negotiate and thence blocks the process of resolving the conflict (Davidson, p 41).
Avoiding the conflict must also be eliminated. Avoidance makes it hard for the resolution process to commence and aggravating the consequences of the conflict (Davidson, p 41).
Blaming others is a very undesirable character in resolving conflicts. Blame game generates circular arguments which stalemate the process (Davidson, p 41).
One cannot achieve his or her desires by using power and position. Thus power and authority should be suppressed at all means for the resolution process to be smooth (Davidson, p 41).
Conclusion
From the discussion employee conflict is a broad subject of study. In the current world there are many changes most of which necessitates conflict. Conflicts at workplaces have a range of causes which are either personal or organizational generated. It is quite hard to avoid or prevent conflicts from emerging. However, if well managed and resolved, their impacts can be greatly minimized.
Our Service Charter
-
Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free
We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers. -
Free Revisions
We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed. -
Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure
We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service. -
Money Back Guarantee
If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit. -
24/7 Customer Support
We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.