100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Tailored to your instructions

Order Now!

Does a state have the right to prevent would-be immigrants from entering its territory?

Does a state have the right to prevent would-be immigrants from entering its territory?
Order Description
Module title: Issues in political theory
Essay counts for 50% of a module and 1/5th of my final year grade so VERY important!
Word limit: 3000 words
Aiming for: 90% or more
4 areas to focus on: Comprehension, Anaylsis, Critique, Presentation
COMPREHENSION: Demonstrates exemplary command of the subject matter including, where appropriate, methodological, technical and scholarship skills.
ANALYSIS: Presents a completely focused, relevant and well-structured answer with full and accurate development of concepts/theories, and excellent use of evidence.
CRITIQUE: Understands and evaluates relevant arguments, debates and/or interpretations in a manner that demonstrates an exceptional capacity for independent thought. This may amount to an extension of existing arguments, debates and/or interpretations.
PRESENTATION: Demonstrates complete command of techniques of academic writing with particular reference to structure, referencing/sourcing and spelling/grammar.
Guiding / reading Questions
Does freedom of association give states a right to exclude?
Does the importance of freedom of movement provide a strong case for open borders?
Does a concern for preserving national identity justify restrictions on immigration?
Core Reading
Kukathas, C., ‘The Case for Open Immigration’, in A. Cohen and C. Wellman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), 207-220. Part 1; Part 2; Part 3
Miller, D., ‘Immigration: the Case for Limits’, in A. Cohen and C. Wellman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), 193-207. Part 1; Part 2; Part 3
Abizadeh, A., ‘Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders’, Political Theory, 36 (2008), 37–65.
Supplementary Reading
Wellman, C. H., ‘Immigration’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), [http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/immigration].
Carens, J., The Ethics of Immigration (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)
Schacknove, A., “Who Is a Refugee?’, Ethics, 95 (1985), 274–284.
Schwartz, W. F. (ed.), Justice in Immigration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
Seglow, J., ‘The Ethics of Immigration’, Political Studies Review, 3 (2005), 317–334.
Simon, J., The Economic Consequences of Immigration (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).
Swain, C. (ed.), Debating Immigration (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
On Open/Closed Borders:
Banting, K. and W. Kymlicka, Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).
Blake, M., ‘Immigration’, in C. Wellman and R. Frey (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Applied Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003).
Carens, J., ‘Live in Domestics, Seasonal Workers and Others Hard to Locate on the Map of Democracy’,Journal of Political Philosophy, 16 (2008), 419-445.
Carens, J., ‘Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders’, Review of Politics, 49 (1987), 251-273 and in W. Kymlicka (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures (Oxford University Press, 1995).
———‘Migration and Morality: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective’, in B. Barry and R. Goodin (eds.) Free Movement (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992), 25-47.
*Fine, S., ‘Freedom of Association is Not the Answer’, Ethics, 120 (2010), 338–356.
Gans, C., ‘Nationalism and Immigration’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 1 (1998), 159-180.
Macedo, S., ‘The Moral Dilemma of U.S. Immigration Policy: Open Borders Versus Social Justice?’ in C. Swain (ed.), Debating Immigration (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 63–81.
Miller, D., ‘Immigration: the Case for Limits’, in A. Cohen and C. Wellman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), 193-207.
——— National Responsibility and Global Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007).
———-‘Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh, Political Theory, 38 (2010), 111-20. (See also Abizadeh’s reply: ‘Democratic Legitimacy and State Coercion: A Reply to David Miller, Political Theory, 38 (2010), 121-30.)
Kapur, D. and J. McHale, ‘Should a Cosmopolitan Worry about the Brain Drain?’ Ethics and International Affairs, 20 (2006), 305–320.
Kukathas, C., ‘Immigration’ in Hugh LaFollette (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
Pevnick, R., ‘Social Trust and the Ethics of Immigration Policy’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 17 (2009), 146–167.
Risse, M., ‘On the Morality of Immigration’, Ethics and International Affairs 22 (2008), 25-34.
Scheffler, S., ‘Immigration and the Significance of Culture’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35 (2007), 93-125.
Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books, 1984), ch. 2.
*Wellman, C. H., ‘Immigration and Freedom of Association’, Ethics, 119 (2008), 109–41. [see also Sarah Fine’s response listed above.]
Woodward, J., ‘Liberalism and Migration’, in B. Barry and R. Goodin (eds.), Free Movement (Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992).
Contributions by Baubock, Blake, Cole and Abizadeh to ‘Is there a Fundamental Right to Universal Mobility?’, Ethics and Economics, 4 (2006) [http://ethique-economique.net/Volume-4-Numero-1.html].
On the Status of Immigrants:
Mayer, R., ‘Guestworkers and Exploitation’, The Review of Politics, 67 (2005), 311-334.
Carens, J., ‘Who Should Get in? The Ethics of Immigration Admissions’, Ethics & International Affairs, 17 (2003), 95-110.
Carens, J., ‘The Case for Amnesty: Time Erodes the State’s Right to Deport’, Boston Review, May/June 2009 [http://bostonreview.net/BR34.3/ndf_immigration.php] – see also the responses to the article esp. by Abizadeh, Bethke Elshtain and Callan.
—– ‘The Rights of Irregular Migrants’, Ethics and International Affairs, 22 (2008), 163-186.
Miller, D., ‘Immigrants, Nations, and Citizenship’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 16 (2008), 371-390.

Our Service Charter

  1. Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free

    We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
  2. Free Revisions

    We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
  3. Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure

    We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
  4. Money Back Guarantee

    If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.
  5. 24/7 Customer Support

    We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.

Excellent Quality
Zero Plagiarism
Expert Writers

Instant Quote

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency (Less urgent, less costly):
Total Cost: NaN

Get 10% Off on your 1st order!