# Make decision analysis and do Strategy Tables by use the Kepner-Tregoe

Make decision analysis and do Strategy Tables by use the Kepner-Tregoe
make a decision analysis AND make Strategy Tables by use the (Kepner-Tregoe).
I will send to you 3 files: The first is a description of the Kepner-Tregoe approach to decision analysis. The second is an example of the application of Strategy Tables. Third one is exaple for Strategy Tables.
Figure 1  Decision Tree For Callaway P-Grid
D1    P1    P2    P3    P4    P5    P6    P7    Sequence    Consequence    Probability    Costs    Expected Cost
data available    meets schedule    accept. to customer    licensing path    success likelihood    customer pays cost    industry impact
0.6    d1-1    Westinghouse does not incur costs    0    \$0    \$0
0
0.4    d1-2    Westinghouse does not incur costs    0    \$0    \$0
0.9                0.6    d1-3    Westinghouse incurs grid HW change cost for one plant     0.5346    \$450,000    \$240,570
50.59    100%    1
0.4    d1-4    Westinghouse incurs grid HW cost for one plant + backfit costs of previously installed plants (no additional costs for sale to plants currently w/o P-grids    0.3564    \$2,450,000    \$873,180
0.99
0.1                    d1-5    Switch to another alternative or sweeten the deal for the customer    0.099    \$900,000    \$89,100
Make Grid HW Change    OK    0.01                        d1-6    Cost of appeasing customer + bad press    0.01    \$900,000    \$9,000
Sums for Grid HW Change Alternative    1        \$1,211,850
D1    P1    P2    P3    P4    P5    P6    P7    Sequence    Consequence    Probability    Costs    Expected Cost
data available    meets schedule    accept. to customer    licensing path    success likelihood    customer pays cost    industry impact
0.6    d2-1    Westinghouse does not incur costs    0.126225    \$0    \$0
0.5
0.4    d2-2    Westinghouse does not incur costs    0.08415    \$0    \$0
85%
0.5                0.6    d2-3    Westinghouse incurs sump-screen HW change cost for one plant     0.126225    \$400,000    \$50,490
50.59        0.5
0.4    d2-4    Westinghouse incurs sump-screen HW change cost for one plant + backfit costs of current P-grid customers + include as part of sale to plants currently without P-grids    0.08415    \$8,400,000    \$706,860
0.15            d2-5    Switch to another alternative    0.07425    \$2,000,000    \$148,500
0.99            NPSH problem
0.5                    d2-6    Switch to another alternative or sweeten the deal for the customer    0.495    \$900,000    \$445,500
Make sump-screen HW Change    OK    0.01                        d2-7    Cost of appeasing customer + bad press    0.01    \$900,000    \$9,000
Sums for Sump-Screen HW Change Alternative    1        \$1,360,350
D1    P1    P2    P3    P4    P5    P6    P7    Sequence    Consequence    Probability    Costs    Expected Cost
data available    meets schedule    accept. to customer    licensing path    success likelihood    customer pays cost    industry impact
0.5    d3-1    Westinghouse incurs code-based analysis cost for one plant     0.046875    \$200,000    \$9,375
0.5
0.5        No    0.5    d3-2    Westinghouse incurs code-based analysis cost for one plant + backfit analysis costs of previously installed plants    0.046875    \$1,200,000    \$56,250
50.59
1        0.5            d3-3    Switch to another alternative    0.09375    \$2,000,000    \$187,500
0.5    d3-4    Westinghouse incurs code-based analysis cost for one plant + testing to support NRC review    0.046875    \$5,200,000    \$243,750
0.5
0.5    d3-5    Westinghouse incurs code-based analysis cost for one plant + testing to support NRC review + backfit analysis costs of previously installed plants    0.046875    \$6,400,000    \$300,000
0.5
NRC    0.5            d3-6    Switch to another alternative    0.09375    \$2,000,000    \$187,500
0.75
0                    d3-7    Switch to another alternative or sweeten the deal for the customer    0    \$900,000    \$0
0.5
0.25                        d3-8    Cost of appeasing customer + bad press    0.125    \$900,000    \$112,500
Make Code-based Analysis
0.5                            d3-9    Switch to another alternative    0.5    \$2,000,000    \$1,000,000
Sums for Code-based Analysis Alternative    1        \$2,096,875
D1    P1    P2    P3    P4    P5    P6    P7    Sequence    Consequence    Probability    Costs    Expected Cost
data available    meets schedule    accept. to customer    licensing path    success likelihood    customer pays cost    industry impact
0.5    d4-1    Westinghouse incurs analysis (plus test) cost for one plant     0.046875    \$400,000    \$18,750
0.5
0.5        No    0.5    d4-2    Westinghouse incurs analysis (plus test) cost for one plant + backfit analysis costs of previously installed plants    0.046875    \$1,600,000    \$75,000
50.59
1        0.5            d4-3    Switch to another alternative    0.09375    \$2,000,000    \$187,500
0.5    d4-4    Westinghouse incurs analysis (plus test) cost for one plant     0.046875    \$400,000    \$18,750
0.5
0.5    d4-5    Westinghouse incurs analysis (plus test) cost for one plant + backfit analysis costs of previously installed plants    0.046875    \$1,600,000    \$75,000
0.5
NRC    0.5            d4-6    Switch to another alternative    0.09375    \$2,000,000    \$187,500
0.75
0                    d4-7    Switch to another alternative or sweeten the deal for the customer    0    \$900,000    \$0
0.5
0.25                        d4-8    Cost of appeasing customer + bad press    0.125    \$900,000    \$112,500
Make First-principle Engineering Analysis
0.5                            d4-9    Switch to another alternative    0.5    \$2,000,000    \$1,000,000
test not successful
Sums for First-principle Engineering Analysis Alternative    1        \$1,675,000
D1    P1    P2    P3    P4    P5    P6    P7    Sequence    Consequence    Probability    Costs    Expected Cost
data available    meets schedule    accept. to customer    licensing path    success likelihood    customer pays cost    industry impact
1    d5-1    Westinghouse incurs analysis cost for one plant     0.05    \$100,000    \$5,000
1
0.05        No    0    d5-2    Westinghouse incurs analysis cost for one plant + backfit analysis costs of previously installed plants    0    \$0    \$0
50.59
1        0            d5-3    Switch to another alternative    0    \$2,000,000    \$0
1    d5-4    Westinghouse incurs analysis cost for one plant     0.095    \$100,000    \$9,500
0.1
0    d5-5    Westinghouse incurs analysis cost for one plant + backfit analysis costs of previously installed plants    0    \$0    \$0
0.95
NRC    0.9            d5-6    Switch to another alternative    0.855    \$2,000,000    \$1,710,000
1
0
Note 1    0
Make PRA Argument
Sums for PRA Alternative    1        \$1,724,500
Note 1 =    Data not available.  Assume use of expert opinion, which would make the success probability lower.
Table 1  Input Data for P-Grid Decision Tree for Callaway – Probabilities
Probabilities Associated With Grid HW Change
Success    Failure    Description
P1
P2    0.99    0.01
P3    0.9    0.1
P4
P5
P6    0    1
P7    0.6    0.4
Probabilities Associated With Sump-Screen HW Change
Success    Failure    Description
P1
P2    0.99    0.01
P3    0.5    0.5
P4
P5    0.85    0.15
P6    0.5    0.5
P7    0.6    0.4
Probabilities Associated With Code-Based Analysis
Success    Failure    Description
P1    0.5    0.5
P2    0.75    0.25
P3    1    0
P4    0.5    0.5
P5    0.5    0.5
P52    0.5    0.5
P6    0    1
P7    0.5    0.5
Probabilities Associated With First-principle Engineering Analysis
Success    Failure    Description
P1    0.5    0.5
P2    0.75    0.25
P3    1    0
P4    0.5    0.5
P5    0.5    0.5
P52    0.5    0.5
P6    0    1
P7    0.5    0.5
Probabilities Associated With PRA Argument
Success    Failure    Description
P1
P2    1    0
P3    1    0
P4    0.05    0.95
P5    1    0
P52    0.1    0.9
P6    0    1
P7    1    0
Table 2  Input Data for P-Grid Decision Tree for Callaway – Costs
Costs Associated With Grid HW Change
C11    0        No cost to Westinghouse
C12    450000        Cost to Westinghouse of grid HW change for one plant (latest numbers from CNFBU-Columbia)
C13    2000000        Backfit costs for previously installed plants
C14    900000    (1)    Switch to another alternative or sweeten the deal for the customer
C15    900000    (1)    Cost of appeasing customer + bad press
Costs Associated With Sump-Screen HW Change
C21    0        No cost to Westinghouse
C22    400000        Cost to Westinghouse of sump-screen HW change for one plant
C23    4800000        Backfit costs for previously installed plants
C23    3200000        Offered to plants currently w/o P-grids as part of package (assume 8 plants)
C24    2000000    (2)    Switch to another alternative
C25    900000    (1)    Switch to another alternative or sweeten the deal for the customer
C26    900000    (3)    Cost of appeasing customer + bad press
Costs Associated With Code-based Analysis
C31
C32    200000        Cost to Westinghouse of analysis for one plant
C32    5000000        Cost to Westinghouse for testing to support NRC Review (for heated tests, add \$5 million)
C33    1200000        Backfit analysis costs for previously installed plants
C34    2000000    (2)    Switch to another alternative
C35    900000    (1)    Switch to another alternative or sweeten the deal for the customer
C36    900000    (3)    Cost of appeasing customer + bad press
Costs Associated With First-principle Engineering Analysis
C41
C42    400000        Cost to Westinghouse of analysis for one plant (including test)
C43    1200000        Backfit analysis costs for previously installed plants
C44    2000000    (2)    Switch to another alternative
C45    900000    (1)    Switch to another alternative or sweeten the deal for the customer
C46    900000    (3)    Cost of appeasing customer + bad press
Costs Associated With PRA Argument
C41
C42    100000        Cost to Westinghouse of analysis for one plant
C43            Backfit analysis costs for previously installed plants
C44    2000000    (2)    Switch to another alternative
C45        (1)    Switch to another alternative or sweeten the deal for the customer
C46        (3)    Cost of appeasing customer + bad press
Notes:
1    Assumed to be twice the cost of the grid change alternative
2    Guesstimate; to be justified.
3    Assumed to be no more than twice the cost of the grid change alternative                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT ?

# Our Service Charter

1. ### Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free

We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
2. ### Free Revisions

We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
3. ### Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure

We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
4. ### Money Back Guarantee

If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.

We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.

Excellent Quality
Zero Plagiarism
Expert Writers

or