Paper, Order, or Assignment Requirements
Assessment 1: Individual module assignment (2 x 30%)
Overview: Quality module assessment: Journal article review (30%)
Please refer to the recent quality management literature (academic journals) and select one article published within the past three years. The focus of this exercise is on the development of analytical skills. Consult with the lecturer about the appropriateness of the article prior to starting the assessment; then conduct a thorough critique, addressing and considering the following points.
§ Overall “message” or objectives of the study/article.
§ Relevance of the article to:
– The broad total quality management literature.
– Industry practitioners.
§ Gaps/weaknesses/limitations of the article.
i Note: Be sure you understand what is meant by “critique”. Critique is an accepted and established process of orderly scholarly debate. Critique is influenced by the scientific method of analysis. Critique is based upon an informed opinion, and never upon personal opinion. Informed opinion is accepted as being technical knowledge, personal or professional experience, or specified training. If you use other academic journals to inform your opinion, be sure to reference and cite them properly using the Harvard referencing style. The university’s library website has an excellent referencing guide at http://library.uws.edu.au/FILES/cite_Harvard.pdf
The format of the critique must include the following sections (in clear headings please):
Introduction This section is not an executive summary. Approximately, five per cent of the length of the entire document.
Analysis Analysis of the articles content, objectives, etc. Approximately, 30 per cent of the length of the entire document.
Gaps, limitations and weaknesses identified in article Gaps typically refer to the area of knowledge under investigation, for instance. Limitations refer to the scope of the study – its “generalisability” and/or applicability of the findings, etc. Weaknesses refer to the article itself: its arguments, methodology, and any problems you might identify in it. Approximately, 30 per cent of the length of the entire document.
Implications Implications of the study’s findings for:
1. The field of quality management.
2. Industry practitioners.
3. Policy makers (government).
Approximately, 30 per cent of the length of the entire document.
Conclusion Approximately five per cent of the length of the entire document.
Approximate number of words of the document: 1,000 words plus or minus 10 per cent.
Marking criteria and standards
The assessment is heavily reliant upon thoroughness, in-depth discussion, and critical analysis. In addition, clarity, proper sentence structure, grammar and other communication skills are largely expected of postgraduate students; these skills will also be rigorously assessed/evaluated and contribute 30 per cent of the assessment marks. The marking guide for this assessment item follows. The report should be submitted in Microsoft Word .doc or .docx format via Turnitin.
MARKS DEPTH AND BREADTH OF COVERAGE (70%) STRUCTURE, LANGUAGE, AND CONVENTIONS (30%)
49 and below Overall, the content was superficial, and/or inadequately addressed the areas of the critique, clearly illustrating lack of understanding, effort, commitment, time management, and competency. The written work is not of an academic/ professional business writing standard. For example, there are multiple errors in spelling, word use, grammar, sentence structure, etc.
64-50 Different aspects of the exercise/question were addressed and researched adequately. Discussion, interpretations and recommendations were brief and unorganised, demonstrating limited understanding, preparation, time management and overall limited preparation. The structure of the written work is very basic, demonstrating limited polishing and self-critique prior to completing the assessment. Several areas show gaps/shortcomings in spelling, word choice, grammar, and related issues.
74-65 Most aspects of the critique were addressed adequately but the overall quality of the report is far from being outstanding. For example, the discussion, implications, recommendations, and other critical areas of the answer/discussion were only minimally elaborated. Only some aspects of the written work conform to an acceptable academic/ professional business writing standard. Some spelling, word choice, and grammar issues are/were identified in the report.
84-75 Most aspects of the critique were addressed in depth, though overall the quality of the content falls short from being outstanding. For example, the discussion, implications, recommendations, and other critical areas of the discussion were not elaborated as thoroughly and as extensively as they are expected to be at a postgraduate level. Most aspects of the written work conform to a high academic/professional business writing standard. However, there are gaps and shortcomings, for instance, concerning spelling, grammar other critical elements pertaining to business writing.
100-85 The critique document was skillfully completed. For example, in terms of discussion, elaboration, and structure, the writer demonstrated thoroughness and depth. Outstanding analytical skills were demonstrated, especially in discussing gaps and limitations of the article being critiqued, as well as presenting the implications of the findings for the field of quality management and for industry practitioners. In essence: The written work shows great depth of thought, excellent development of argument, logical analysis, and insight into the subject. All aspects of the written work conform to a high academic/professional business writing standard, especially regarding word choice, spelling, grammar, sentence structure, length of sentences, use of headings, as well as other critical elements pertaining to business writing.
Approximate number of words of the document: 1,000 words plus or minus 10 per cent.
I found the following article to work on
International Journal for Quality research UDK- 378.014.3(497.11) Short Scientific Paper (1.03)
Vol. 6, No. 3, 2012 193
Ashwini Sharma1) Dixit Garg2) Ashish Agarwal3)
1) ITM University, Gurgaon, India firstname.lastname@example.org
2) National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra, India, email@example.com
3) Indra Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi, India, firstname.lastname@example.org
QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN SUPPLY CHAINS: THE LITERATURE REVIEW
Abstract: Supply chain management is used by most of the organizations worldwide, therefore the large number of studies has been done to explore this field. Moreover, its interlinking with the quality management perspective is still very limited. It is worth mentioning here that, in the present competitive world, the dynamics of market does not allow any deviation in quality of end product. Therefore, the importance of quality management is universally espoused by the researchers and practicing managers working in this area. It has been found by the authors that the focused approaches in evaluating quality management issues within inter and intra organization supply chain contexts are indispensable. During review of the open literature available in this area, the authors investigated that in present scenario there are number of quality related issues (either at the suppliers end or at manufacturers end) in supply chain management which needs immediate attention of the researchers. In this context the quality of supply chain itself can provide a path breaking solution at different levels of supply chain management. Moreover, this concept may be applied to address the problems such as product recall, delay in delivery of products etc. regardless of type of industry. In this paper, the authors have reported intensive studies based on the work carried out by various researchers in the area of supply chain management. Further, an attempt has also been made to identify conceptual interlinking between Supply chain management and Quality management through literature review.
Keywords: Supply chain management, Quality, Quality management, Gap analysis
Alexander the Great based his strategies and campaigns on his army’s unique capabilities and these were made possible by effective supply chain management. His strategy and tactics had very closely tied to his ability to get supplies and to run a lean, efficient organization. Several hundred years ago, Napoleon made the remark, “An army marches on its stomach.” Napoleon was a master strategist and a skilful general and this remark shows that he clearly understood the importance of what we now call an
efficient supply chain. Supply chain term was first coined in the early 1980s to describe the range of activities coordinated by an organization to procure and manage supplies (Oliver and Webber, 1982). Supply chains encompass the companies and the business activities needed to design, make, deliver, and use a product or service. Businesses depend on their supply chains to provide them with what they need to survive and thrive. Every business fits into one or more supply chains and has a role to play in each of them.
194 A. Sharma, D. Garg, A.Agarwal
Figure 1: Supply Chain Structure
Figure 2: Factors influencing the supply chain
Initially the term referred to an internal focus bounded by a single organization and how they sourced and procured supplies managed their internal inventory and moved goods onto their customers (Harland, 1995; Macbeth and Ferguson, 1990). “A supply chain consists of all stages involved, directly or indirectly, in fulfilling a customer request. The supply chain not only includes the manufacturer and suppliers, but also transporters, warehouses, retailers, and customers themselves” (Chopra and Meindl, 2006). Customers have so much choice nowadays from an enormous field of competitors that delays in supply mean delays for the customers who are probably not willing to wait when they can obtain the same or similar substitute product elsewhere. Based on the above facts it is observed that the supply chain management has become important and critical aspect to the profit making of any organization. But, the quality management issues have also impacted the performance of supply chain in one way or other. Therefore, one must understand the meaning of quality management.
The quality definition as specified by Joseph Juran, “Quality is the fitness of use” i.e. it is the value of the goods and services as perceived by the supplier, producer and customer. The measure also pertains to the degree to which products and services conform to specifications, requirements and standards at an acceptable price. Some of the definitions of Quality, provided by quality gurus are as follows: · Quality is conformance to requirements (CROSBY) · The efficient production of the quality that the market expects (DEMING) · Quality is what the customer says it is (FEIGENBAUM) · Quality is the loss that a product costs to the society after being shipped to the customer (TAGUCHI) · The totality of features and characteristics of a product or services that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs of the customers (ASQC)
Vol 6, No. 3, 2012 195
· A quality system is the agreed on companywide and plant wide operating work structure, documented in effective, integrated, technical and managerial procedures for guiding the coordinated actions of people, the machines, or the information of company in the best and most practical ways to assume customer quality satisfaction and economical costs of quality. (FEIGENBAUM) · BSI EN ISO 9001: 2000 defines the term “quality” as the “degree to which a set of inherent characteristics (distinguishing features) fulfils requirements” (BSI, 2000) whereas Crosby (Oakland, 1993) described quality as “conformance to customer requirements”. As per the above definitions for quality, Quality management in supply chain can be defined as conformance to requirements. Therefore, we can say that the quality requirements from the supplier’s point of view may be an efficient and seamless flow of activities and resources to the manufacturer so that the optimum gains in terms of profit and highest rating from the manufacturer can be achieved for maximum possible time. The quality requirements from the manufacturer’s point of view may be the optimum integration and utilization of resources to satisfy the internal as well as the external customers in terms of goods and services offered.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
SCM was initially related to the management of inventory within a supply chain. This concept was later broadened to include the management of all functions within a supply chain. According to Chopra and Meindl (2001), supply chain management involves the management of flows between and among stages in a supply chain to maximize total profitability”. This definition suggests that SCM involves management of the flows of products, information, and funds upstream and downstream in the supply chain. SCM also entails making decisions about the locations of production facilities, which products to produce, how to produce them, and finally, how to distribute these products (Sila et al., 2006). In the quest for competitive advantage,
organizations, consultants, practitioners and academics have attempted to organize and integrate supply chain management (SCM) concepts and practices. The areas of Supply chain which has been researched predominantly includes Supply chain Performance, Supply chain collaboration, Supply chain Integration, Supply chain agility, Supply chain Network design etc. As a result, it has been discovered that this subject requires radical thinking because the vastness of the topics is neither well defined nor easily implemented. SCM involves challenges such as developing trust and collaboration among supply chain partners, identifying best practices that can facilitate supply chain process alignment and integration, and successfully implementing the latest collaborative information systems and Internet technologies that drive efficiencies, performance, and quality throughout the supply chain (Carol J. Robinson, Manoj K. Malhotra, 2005). Empirical quality management (QM) research has evolved over the last 20 years. Empirical research has defined and measured QM practices (e.g., Ahire et al., 1996; Flynn et al., 1994; Nair, 2006; Saraph et al., 1989; Sila and Ebrahimpour, 2005). Numerous studies have investigated the relationships among QM practices and various aspects of a firm’s performance (e.g., Adam et al., 1997; Ahire and O’Shaughnessy, 1998; Dow et al., 1999; Kaynak, 2003; Samson and Terziovski, 1999). As competition moves beyond a single firm into the supply network of multi firms, focus is shifting from management of internal practices alone to the management of external firms. Quality managers must integrate their firms’ practices with those of customers and suppliers (e.g., Flynn and Flynn, 2005; Kannan and Tan, 2005; Robinson and Malhotra, 2005; Sila et al., 2006). Integrating QM and supply chain management (SCM) will be important for future competitiveness (Flynn and Flynn, 2005; Matthews, 2006; Robinson and Malhotra, 2005). Quality assurance in supply chain management related to different kinds of goods and services have been researched by (Manning et al. 2007; V. John Peters 1999; Braglia and Petroni, 2000; Sroufe and Curkovic, 2008) in order to align the supply chain with quality assurance to derive the models which can be adopted by the organisations to assure the quality.
196 A. Sharma, D. Garg, A.Agarwal
The Supply chain performance measurement (Bongsug Chae, 2009; Verma et al., 2008; Rick Hoole, 2005; Khan et al., 2009; Hong et al., 2010; Kannana and Tan, 2005; Wickramatillake et al., 2007; Theeranuphattana and Tang, 2008; Sun et al., 2009; Chris Morgan, 2004; Yeung, 2008; Burgess and Singh, 2006; Fantazy et al., 2009; Hervani et al., 2005; Soo Wook Kim, 2006 ) models, methods and frameworks related to supply chain partnership (kim et al., 2010), supply chain integration (Flynn et al., 2010), supply chain interaction (Salvador et al., Salvador), Supplier relations (Giannakis, 2007; Ou et al., 2010; Simpson and Power, 2005; Mihalis Giannakis, 2007; Cox et al., 2004) Supply chain Information (Forslund and Jonsson, 2007; Visich et al., 2009; Fawcett et al., 2007; Kaipia and Hartiala, 2006; Sezen, 2008), supplier selection (Weber, 1996), Quality improvement (kuei et al., 2001; Cagnazzo et al., 2010; Mangiameli and Roethlein, 2001), Supply chain effectiveness (Zokaei and Hines, 2007), Supply chain collaboration (Papakiriakopoulos and Pramatari, 2010; Wiengarten et al., 2010) for different types of goods and services such as FMCG, perishable goods (aramyan et al., 2007), services etc. have been researched for increasing the performance of supply chain at different cross sections of it to derive the profit as well as sustained market position and growth for organisations. Supply chain quality management has been explored by researchers where six hypotheses related to Supply chain quality management developed through literature review and tested using survey data from US manufacturing companies (Sila et al., 2006). Relationship between supply chain quality management practices and organisational performance have been researched and it was found that organizational performance could be enhanced through improved supply chain quality management (Chu-Hua kuei et al. 2001). (Robinson and Malhotra, 2005) defined the concept of supply chain quality management as the formal coordination and integration of business processes involving all partner organizations in the supply channel to measure, analyze and continually improve products, services, and processes in order to create value and achieve satisfaction of intermediate and final customers in the marketplace. They also found out
its relevance to academic and industrial practice and proposed a Quality-SCM framework. (Taticchi and Brun, 2010) identified role of performance measurement systems to support quality improvement initiatives at supply chain level. (Gionata Carmignani, 2009) modified interpretation of ISO 9001:2000 norm and introduced a research to determine a standard to implement a management system for a whole supply chain through the identification of the main supply chain processes and drivers. (Vanichchinchai and Igel, 2009) found that TQM and SCM have same ultimate goal which is customer satisfaction. TQM emphasizes internal (employee) participation and SCM focuses on external (business partners) partnerships but there is a need to emphasize both internal and external partnerships to further strengthen the emphasis on “total” TQM and the entire supply chain in SCM. (Peters, 1999) discussed service quality and total quality management as a business strategy designed to add value to customers. (Lo et al., 2006) in their work on managing quality effectively in supply chain extracted ten critical factors for describing a Supply Quality Management system. These factors could be clustered into three major groups namely supplier selection, supplier development and supplier integration. This study has not covered the relationship among supply quality management, supplier quality and buyer quality. (Chu-Hua kuei et al., 2002) in their work developed a two stage frame work on supply chain quality and technology relate to only upstream of supply chain. Foster Jr. S. T. (2008) defined supply chain quality management (SCQM) to operationalize and understand the effect of increased emphasis on supply chain management on the practice of quality management. Reviewed current research in quality management and identified common themes found in the literature. Key quality management content variables identified are customer focus, quality practices, supplier relations, leadership, HR practices, business results, and safety. Based on these variables he proposed areas for future research in the field of supply chain quality management. (Fynesa et al., 2005) in their work on the impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance developed a conceptual framework incorporating dimensions of SC relationships and quality
Vol 6, No. 3, 2012 197
performance. (Kaynak and Hartley, 2008) found that the inclusion of customer focus and supplier quality management in the QM model supports the importance of internal and external integration for quality performance. (Beamon et al., 1998) proposed a process quality model for the analysis, improvement and control of supply chain and concluded that the coordination of logistics functions into integrated supply chain systems has increased the need for improved process quality. Improving the quality of all supply chain processes results in reduced costs, improved resource utilization, and improved process efficiency. (Seth et al., 2006) devised a conceptual model for quality of service in the supply chain and found that majority of studies on service quality have focused on service industries, not supply chain as a whole. On finding that there are certain service quality domains that have not been investigated sufficiently, they proposed a model for assessing the quality of service at various interfaces of supply chain using 3PL. (Mowat and Collins, 2006) worked on consumer behavior and fruit quality and found in their survey that 124 consumers revealed that 46 percent ranked price as the most important attribute influencing the purchase decision, followed by taste (25 percent), size (13 percent) and skin color (3 percent). Taste was the attribute most frequently associated with disappointment (84 percent of responses), followed by price (10 percent) and texture (6 percent). Supply chains in new and emerging agricultural industries typically lack information linking product quality with consumer behavior. (Ramudhin et al., 2008) worked on incorporating cost of quality in supply chain network design to ensure the lowest overall cost, because it reduces the probability of defects and hence the probability of additional cost which might be due to corrective action but further research could model cost of quality (COQ) at both supplier and plants simultaneously. In industries such as the aerospace industry, the variable production cost is high; hence producing extra parts to compensate for defectives would be a costly option. (Sengupta, 2010) worked on placing a quality-oriented coordination process between the supply and receiving partners by following the mathematical model which supports the development of an effective supply chain network that maximizes profit. (Romano and
Vinelli, 2001) worked towards understanding how quality can be managed using a supply chain which reports a case study conducted on Marzotto, an important Italian textile and Apparel Company, and its supply chain relationships. The study compares the quality practices in the two different kinds of supply network of which Marzotto is the focal firm. One is managed using a traditional customer-supplier approach and the other a broader and more coordinated perspective. In the latter case, it was found that the whole supply network could improve its ability to meet the expectations of the final consumer in terms of quality through the joint definition and comanagement of quality practices/procedures. (Yang et al., 2007) carried out a case study in Samsung, where they found that the effort and investment in synthesizing SCM and six sigma, and developing a unique six-sigma-based methodology to improve its SCM operation, have turned out to be fruitful. The Black Belt program has produced highly qualified and talented SCM specialists, who are currently training the methodology to members in their organizations and leading SCM projects. (Braglia and Petroni, 2010) describes a multiple attribute utility theory based on the use of data envelopment analysis (DEA), aimed at helping purchasing managers to formulate viable sourcing strategies in the changing market place. DEA has proved to be capable of handling multiple conflicting attributes inherent in supplier selection while simultaneously trading-off key supplier selection criteria. Burgess and et al. (2006) found that the supply chain field is a relatively “new” one; several disciplines claim ownership of the field; consensus is lacking on the definition of the term; contextual focus is mostly on the manufacturing industry; predominantly “process” conceptual framing prevails; research methods employed are mostly analytical conceptual, empirical surveys or case studies; the positivist research paradigmatic stance is prevalent; and theories related to transaction cost economics and competitive advantage dominate. (Das et al., 2008) found that with a few notable exceptions, there is no guidance in the literature for operations managers trying to understand the role that employee safety at their own or a supplier could play in quality outcomes. Empirical tests of these propositions provide initial evidence that safety does indeed
198 A. Sharma, D. Garg, A.Agarwal
contribute to quality outcomes in the supply chain.
3. RESULTS OF STUDY
The literature which has been reviewed
clearly shows that there are ample opportunities in quality management in supply chain. Figure 3 shows the papers reviewed for supply chain related areas in which majority of papers are related to Supply chain performance.
Figure 3: Papers reviewed in Supply Chain related area
Figure 4 shows the different methodologies adopted by the researchers for the research.
Figure 4: Methodologies adopted by researchers
In order to categorize outcome of the literature review as above, international journals have been referred and the related papers were found predominantly in Journal of manufacturing technology (11%), Supply chain management: an
international journal (21%), International journal of operation and production management (14%), Journal of operation management (21%), Supply chain management (11%) (Figure 5).
Vol 6, No. 3, 2012 199
Figure 5: Papers reviewed from Various International Journals
Out of the total 112 papers reviewed the related areas covered in the supply chain management field in terms of percentage of papers found to be SC Performance (21%), Quality
Management in SC (8 %), Supply chain collaboration (11 %), Supply chain management (16%), Agile Supply Chain (4%), Supply Chain Design (9%), Flexibility (8%), TQM (13%),
200 A. Sharma, D. Garg, A.Agarwal
Information (8%), Literature review (3%). The methodologies adopted by the researchers in the different areas of supply chain management literature review are Conceptual framework (16%), Gap Analysis (5%), Analytical (4%), Survey (19%), Hypothesis (10%), Case-study (20%), Onsite interviews (4%), Empirical(11%), AHP, QFD and Balance Score Card (4%), Modelling(4%), DEA (2%). Out of total papers reviewed 8% of the papers are based on quality management in supply chain where the main focus was the improvement in quality of product and merely 2 papers are on the supply chain quality.
4. GAPS IN LITERATURE
The different aspects of Supply chain have been studied and emphasized by the researchers at different cross section of the industries over the years such as supply chain performance, SC coordination, SC Integration, SC Communication and information sharing, SC Leadership, SC best practices etc. but there is a huge gap existing for the comprehensive research on quality aspects of supply chain (Carol J. Robinson, Manoj K. Malhotra). Most of the research and studies done on quality aspects of supply chain have focused on the management of quality of products in the supply chain. Many research articles in supply chain context are found to be on performance of supply chain but the question arises that what about Quality of supply chain itself. Does it imply that performance of the SC is same as quality of supply chain? If yes then why the definition is different for both and if not, what can be the
quality of supply chain? The qualities aspects of supply chain are not dealt specifically as do supply chains have the quality? If yes, then what are these quality parameters? How do these parameters affect the quality? How do supply chain quality practices affect performance? How is quality managed in the context of the supply chain? How is management integrated with customers and suppliers to improve supply chain performance? How do these changing relationships influence quality results in firms? Therefore, the above can be considered as the future scope of research in this field.
Supply chain management is key focus area in the current scenario of global competitive market. In this market the company or organization having the quality in supply chain will only survive. It has been observed that quality in supply chain has not been focused in the literature related to supply chain management. The 8% of the papers reviewed have focused on quality management in supply chain. Here the main focus was the improvement in quality of product and not on the supply chain quality. In this paper the authors have attempted to study the existing literature on supply chain management and quality management. Analysis has been carried out to categorize the research papers published in international journals on the basis of different areas of supply chain management. This paper will be useful for the researchers in their study.
 Agarwal, A., Shankar, R. & Tiwari, M. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 36, Issue 4, pp. 443-457.  Matopoulos, A., Vlachopoulou, M. and Manthou, V. (2007). A conceptual framework for supply chain collaboration: empirical evidence from the agri-food industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 12, Issue 3, pp. 177–186.  Ajay Das, Mark Pagell, Michael Behm, Anthony Veltri “Toward a theory of the linkages between safety and quality” Journal of Operations Management 26 (2008) 521–535.  Alistair Mowat and Ray Collins “Consumer behaviour and fruit quality: supply chain management in an emerging industry” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal Volume 5. Number 1. 2000. pp. 45-54.
Vol 6, No. 3, 2012 201
 Amar Ramudhin, Chaher Alzaman and Akif A. Bulgak “ Incorporating the cost of quality in supply chain design” Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering Vol. 14 No. 1, 2008 pp. 7186.  Andrew Cox, Glyn Watson, Chris Lonsdale and Joe Sanderson “Managing appropriately in power regimes: relationship and performance management in 12 supply chain cases” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Volume 9 • Number 5 • 2004 • pp. 357–371.  Andy C.L. Yeung “Strategic supply management, quality initiatives, and organizational performance” Journal of Operations Management 26 (2008) 490–502.  Aref A. Hervani and Marilyn M. Helms and Joseph Sarkis “Performance measurement for green supply chain mananagement” Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 12 No. 4, 2005, pp. 330-353.  Arif Khan K B. Bakkappa Bhimaraya A. Metri and B.S. Sahay “ Impact of agile supply chains’ delivery practices on firms’ performance: cluster analysis and validation” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 14/1 (2009) 41–48.  Assadej Vanichchinchai and Barbara Igel “ Total quality management and supply chain management: similarities and differences” The TQM Magazine Vol. 21 No. 3, 2009 pp. 249-260.  Aziz Ahmed, Naser Ahmed and Ahmed Salman “Critical issues in packaged food business” British Food Journal Vol. 107 No. 10, 2005 pp. 760-780.  B.S. Sahay, Jatinder N.D. Gupta and Ramneesh Mohan “Managing supply chains for competitiveness: the Indian scenario” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11/1 (2006) 15–24.  Barbara B. Flynn, Baofeng Huo Xiande Zhao “ The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach” Journal of Operations Management 28 (2010) 58–71.  Benita M. Beamon and Tonja M. Ware “ A process quality model for the analysis, improvement and control of supply chain systems” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 28 No. 9/10, 1998, pp. 704-715.  Bongsug (Kevin) Chae “ Developing key performance indicators for supply chain: an industry perspective” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 14/6 (2009) 422–428.  Brian Fynesa,_, Chris Vossb, Sea´n de Bu´ rcac “ The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance” Int. J. Production Economics 96 (2005) 339–354.  Bu¨ lent Sezen “ Relative effects of design, integration and information sharing on supply chain performance” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 13/3 (2008) 233–240.  Carol J. Robinson, Manoj K. Malhotra “Defining the concept of supply chain quality management and its relevance to academic and industrial practice” Int. J. Production Economics 96 (2005) 315–337.  Chandika Diran Wickramatillake S.C. Lenny Koh A. Gunasekaran Subramanium Arunachalam “ Measuring performance within the supply chain of a large scale project” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12/1 (2007) 52–59.  Charles A. Weber “ A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor erformance” Supply Chain Management, Volume 1 • Number 1 • 1996 • pp. 28–39.  Chin S. Ou Fang C. Liu Yu C. Hung David C. Yen “ A structural model of supply chain management on firm performance” International Journal of Operations & Production Management Vol. 30 No. 5, 2010 pp. 526-545.  Chris Morgan “ Structure, speed and salience: performance measurement in the supply chain” Business Process Management Journal Vol. 10 No. 5, 2004 pp. 522-536.  Chu-Hua kuei et al. “ Developing supply chain strategies based on survey of supply chain quality and technology management” International journal of quality and reliability management, Vol. 19 No. 7, 2002, pp 889-901.
202 A. Sharma, D. Garg, A.Agarwal
 Chu-Hua kuei et al. “ The relationship between supply chain quality management practices and organisational performance” International journal of quality and reliability management volume 18, no. 8, 2001,pp 864-872.  Dayna F. Simpson and Damien J. Power “Use the supply relationship to develop lean and green suppliers” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10/1 (2005) 60–68.  Desmond Doran and Peter Thomas and Nigel Caldwell “Examining buyer-supplier relationships within a service sector context” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10/4 (2005) 272–277.  Dimitris Papakiriakopoulos and Katerina Pramatari “ Collaborative performance measurement in supply chain” Industrial Management & Data Systems Vol. 110 No. 9, 2010 pp. 1297-1318.  Dong-Young Kim, Vinod Kumar and Uma Kumar “Performance assessment framework for supply chain partnership” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 15/3 (2010) 187– 195.  Edmund Prater Markus Biehl Michael Alan Smith “International supply chain agility Tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21 No. 5/6, 2001, pp. 823-839.  Elcio Mendonc¸a Tachizawa and Cristina Gime´nez Thomsen “Drivers and sources of supply flexibility: an exploratory study” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 27 No. 10, 2007 pp. 1115-1136.  Elcio Mendonca Tachizawa Cristina Gime´nez Thomsen “Drivers and sources of supply flexibility: an exploratory study” International Journal of Operations & Production Management Vol. 27 No. 10, 2007 pp. 1115-1136.  Emilio Esposito and Renato Passaro “ Evolution of the supply chain in the Italian railway industry” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal14/4 (2009) 303–313.  Fabrizio Salvador and Cipriano Forza Manus Rungtusanatham and Thomas Y. Choi “Supply chain interactions and time-related performances An operations management perspective” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21 No. 4, 2001, pp. 461475.  Frank Wiengarten Paul Humphreys and Guangming Cao Brian Fynes Alan McKittrick “ Collaborative supply chain practices and performance: exploring the key role of information quality” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 15/6 (2010) 463–473.  Geir Grundva°g Ottesen “Do upstream actors in the food chain know end-users’ quality perceptions? Findings from the Norwegian salmon farming industry” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11/5 (2006) 456–463.  Gionata Carmignani “ Supply chain and quality management The definition of a standard to implement a process management system in a supply chain” Business Process Management Journal Vol. 15 No. 3, 2009 pp. 395-407.  Go¨ran SvenssonHans Ba°a°th “ Supply chain management ethics: conceptual framework and illustration” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 13/6 (2008) 398–405.  H.M. Wee Simon Wu “ Lean supply chain and its effect on product cost and quality: a case study on Ford Motor Company” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 14/5 (2009) 335–341.  Hale Kaynak a,*, Janet L. Hartley “ A replication and extension of quality management into the supply chain” Journal of Operations Management 26 (2008) 468–489.  Helena Forslund Patrik Jonsson “ The impact of forecast information quality on supply chain performance” International Journal of Operations & Production Management Vol. 27 No. 1, 2007 pp. 90-107.  Hong Mo Yang, Byung Seok Choi, Hyung Jin Park, Min Soo Suh and Bongsug (Kevin) Chae “ Supply chain management six sigma: a management innovation methodology at the Samsung Group” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12/2 (2007) 88–95.
Vol 6, No. 3, 2012 203
 Ismail Sila, Maling Ebrahimpour & Christiane Birkholz “ Quality in supply chains: an empirical analysis” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12/4 (2007) 304–315.  Jao-Hong Cheng, Chung-Hsing Yeh and Chia-Wen Tu “Trust and knowledge sharing in green supply chains” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13/4 (2008) 283–295.  Jari Collin Elisa, Helsinki, Finland, and Eero Eloranta and Jan Holmstro¨m “ How to design the right supply chains for your customers” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 14/6 (2009) 411–417.  Jens Hamprecht, Daniel Corsten, Manfred Noll and Evelyn Meier “Controlling the sustainability of food supply chains” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10/1 (2005) 7–10.  Jiun-Sheng Chris Lin and Ching-Rung Chen “Determinants of manufacturers’ selection of distributors” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13/5 (2008) 356–365.  John K. Visich Suhong Li Basheer M. Khumawala and Pedro M. Reyes “ Empirical evidence of RFID impacts on supply chain performance” International Journal of Operations & Production Management Vol. 29 No. 12, 2009 pp. 1290-1315.  John K. Visich, Suhong Li, C Basheer, M. Khumawala, Pedro M. Reyes “Empirical evidence of RFID impacts on supply chain performance” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 29 No. 12, 2009, pp. 1290-1315  John Noonan and Michael Wallace “Building responsive contract manufacturers through valuefocused strategies” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Volume 9 • Number 4 • 2004 • pp. 295-302.  K. Das S. Sengupta “ Modelling supply chain network: a quality-oriented approach” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management Vol. 27 No. 5, 2010 pp. 506-526.  Kamel Aissa Fantazy, Vinod Kumar and Uma Kumar “ An empirical study of the relationships among strategy, flexibility, and performance in the supply chain context” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 14/3 (2009) 177–188  Karkoszka, T. Estimation of processes realization risk as a manner of safety management in the integrated systems”, International Journal for Quality Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. (2011), 131141.  Katerina Pramatari “Collaborative supply chain practices and evolving technological approaches” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12/3 (2007) 210–220.  Keivan Zokaei and Peter Hines “ Achieving consumer focus in supply chains” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management Vol. 37 No. 3, 2007 pp. 223-247.  Kenneth J. Preiss and Peter A. Murray “Fashions of learning: improving supply-chain relationships” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10/1 (2005) 18–25.  Kevin Burgess and Prakash J. Singh “A proposed integrated framework for analysing supply chains” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 11/4 (2006) 337–344.  Kevin Burgess Prakash J. Singh Rana Koroglu “ Supply chain management: a structured literature review and implications for future research” International Journal of Operations & Production Management Vol. 26 No. 7, 2006 pp. 703-729  Kevin Lindermana, Roger G. Schroedera, Srilata Zaheera, Charles Liedtkeb, Adrian S. Choob “ Integrating quality management practices with knowledge creation processes” Journal of Operations Management 22 (2004) 589–607.  L. Manning, R.N. Baines and S.A. Chadd “ Quality assurance models in the food supply chain” British Food Journal Vol. 109 No. 4, 2007 pp. 291-304.  Linda Boardman Liu, Paul Berger. Amy Zeng and Arthur Gerstenfeld “Applying the analytic hierarchy process to the offshore outsourcing location decision” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13/6 (2008) 435–449.  Luc Cassivi “Collaboration planning in a supply chain” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11/3 (2006) 249–258.
204 A. Sharma, D. Garg, A.Agarwal
 Luca Cagnazzo Paolo Taticchi and Alessandro Brun “ The role of performance measurement systems to support quality improvement initiatives at supply chain level” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management Vol. 59 No. 2, 2010 pp. 163-185.  Lusine H. Aramyan, Alfons G.J.M. Oude Lansink, Jack G.A.J. van der Vorst and Olaf van Kooten “SC Performance in agri-food supplychains: a case study” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12/4 (2007) 304–315.  Lutz Preuss “Addressing sustainable development through public procurement: the case of local government” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 14/3 (2009) 213–223.  Manisra Baramichai, Emory W. Zimmers Jr and Charalambos A. Marangos “Agile supply chain transformation matrix: an integrated tool for creating an Agile enterprise” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12/5 (2007) 334–348.  Manisra Baramichai, Emory W. Zimmers Jr and Charalambos A. Marangos “Agile supply chain transformation matrix: an integrated tool for creating an agile enterprise” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12/5 (2007) 334–348.  Marcello Braglia Alberto Petroni “A quality assurance-oriented methodology for handling tradeoffs in supplier selection” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 30 No. 2, 2000, pp. 96-111.  Mihajlović, M.. “Quality of Inter-Organizational System (IOS) framework for Supply Chain Management (SCM): Study of six collaborative factors from supplier and customer perspectives.” International Journal for Quality Research 4.3 (2010): 181-192.  Mihalis Giannakis “ Performance measurement of supplier relationships” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12/6 (2007) 400–411  Mihalis Giannakis “ SC Performance of supplier relationships” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12/4 (2007) 304–315  Nitin Seth S.G. Deshmukh Prem Vrat “ A conceptual model for quality of service in the supply chain” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management Vol. 36 No. 7, 2006 pp. 547-575.  Paul C. Hong David D. Dobrzykowski A d Mark A. Vonderembse “ Integration of supply chain IT and lean practices for mass customization Benchmarking of product and service focused manufacturers” Benchmarking: An international Journal Vol. 17 No. 4, 2010 pp. 561-592.  Paul Levy, John Bessant, Bob Sang and Richard Lamming “ Developing integration through total quality supply chain management” Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 6 No. 3, 1995, pp. 4-12.  Paul mangiameli and Christopher j. Roethlein “ An examination of quality performance at different levels in a connected supply chain: A preliminary case study” Integrated Manufacturing Systems 12/2 126-133.  Peter c. weber and Thomas w. speh “ Using Balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance” Journal of business logistics, vol. 21, No. 1, 75-93, 2000  Pietro Romano and Andrea Vinelli “ Quality management in a supply chain perspective Strategic and operative choices in a textile-apparel network” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21 No. 4, 2001, pp. 446-460.  Premaratne Samaranayake “ A conceptual framework for supply chain management: a structural integration” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 10/1 (2005) 47–59.  R. Cigolini M. Cozzi M. Perona “A new framework for supply chain management Conceptual model and empirical test” International Journal of Operations & Production Management Vol. 24 No. 1, 2004 pp. 7-41.  R. Mason-Jones and D.R. Towill “Information enrichment: designing the supply chain for competitive advantage” Supply Chain Management, Volume 2 • Number 4 • 1997 • pp. 137–148.  Raul Rodriguez Rodriguez, Raul Poler Escoto, Josefa Mula Bru and Angel Ortiz Bas “Collaborative forecasting management: fostering creativity within the meta value chain context” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13/5 (2008) 366–374.
Vol 6, No. 3, 2012 205
 Richard Oloruntoba and Richard Gray “Humanitarian aid: an agile supply chain?” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 11/2 (2006) 115–120.  Rick Hoole “ Five ways to simplify your supply chain” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal10/1 (2005) 3–6.  Riikka Kaipia and Helena Hartiala “ Information-sharing in supply chains: five proposals on how to proceed” The International Journal of Logistics Management Vol. 17 No. 3, 2006 pp. 377393.  Robert E. Spekman, John W. Kamauff Jr and Niklas Myhr “An empirical investigation into supply chain management: a perspective on partnerships” Supply Chain Management Volume 3 • Number 2 • 1998 • pp. 53–67.  Robert Mason, Chandra Lalwani and Roger Boughton “Combining vertical and horizontal collaboration for transport optimisation” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12/3 (2007) 187–199.  Robert Sroufe, Sime Curkovic “ An examination of ISO 9000:2000 and supply chain quality assurance” Journal of Operations Management 26 (2008) 503–520.  Roger G. Schroeder, Kevin Linderman, Charles Liedtke, Adrian S. Choo “Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory” Journal of Operations Management 26 (2008) 536–554.  S. Thomas Foster Jr. “Towards an understanding of supply chain quality management” Journal of Operations Management 26 (2008) 461–467.  S.M. Disney and D.R. Towill “A methodology for benchmarking replenishment-induced bullwhip” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 11/2 (2006) 160–168.  Samual H Huang, Mohit Uppaland J shi “A product driven approach to manufacturing supply chain selection” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal Volume 7 No. 4, (2002) 189-199.  Shams-ur Rahman “Quality management in logistics: an examination of industry practices” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11/3 (2006) 233–240.  Sharon Ordoobadi “Application of Taguchi loss functions for supplier selection” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 14/1 (2009) 22–30.  Shin-Chan Ting and Danny I. Cho “ An integrated approach for supplier selection and purchasing decisions” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13/2 (2008) 116– 127.  Siddharth Varma Subhash Wadhwa and S.G. Deshmukh “ Evaluating petroleum supply chain performance Application of analytical hierarchy process to balanced scorecard” Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics Vol. 20 No. 3, 2008 pp. 343-356.  Simon Croom “Restructuring supply chains through information channel innovation” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21 No. 4, 2001, pp. 504515.  Soo Wook Kim “Effects of supply chain management practices, integration and competition capability on performance” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11/3 (2006) 241–248  Stanley E. Fawcett Paul Osterhaus Gregory M. Magnan James C. Brau Matthew W. McCarter “ Information sharing and supply chain performance: the role of connectivity and willingness” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12/5 (2007) 358–368.  Stanley E. Fawcett, Paul Osterhaus, Gregory M. Magnan, James C. Brau and Matthew W. McCarter “Information sharing and supply chain performance: the role of connectivity and willingness” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12/5 (2007) 358–368.  Stefan A. Seuring “Assessing the rigor of case study research in supply chain management” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13/2 (2008) 128–137  Stephen J. New “The scope of supply chain management research” Supply Chain Management Volume 2 • Number 1 • 1997 pp. 15–22.
206 A. Sharma, D. Garg, A.Agarwal
 Su-Yol Lee “ Drivers for the participation of small and medium-sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13/3 (2008) 185–198.  Szu-Yuan Sun and Meng-Hsiang Hsu Wen-Jin Hwang “ The impact of alignment between supply chain strategy and environmental uncertainty on SCM performance” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 14/3 (2009) 201–212.  Theeranuphattana, A. & Tang, J.C.S. (2008). A conceptual model of performance measurement for supply chains Alternative considerations. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 125-148.  Theodore P. Stank and Thomas J. Goldsby “A framework for transportation decision making in an integrated supply chain” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Volume 5. Number 2. 2000. pp. 71-77.  Theodore P. Stank, Patricia J. Daugherty and Chad W. Autry “Collaborative planning: supporting automatic replenishment programs” Supply Chain Management, Volume 4 • Number 2 • 1999 • pp. 75–85.  Togar M. Simatupang and Ramaswami Sridharan “ A benchmarking scheme for supply chain collaboration” Benchmarking: An international Journal Vol. 11 No. 1, 2004 pp. 9-30.  Uma V. Sridharan and W. Royce Caines and Cheryl C. Patterson “Implementation of supply chain management and its impact on the value of firms” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10/4 (2005) 313–318  V. John Peters “ Total service quality management” Managing Service Quality Volume 29 • Number 1 • 1999 • pp. 6–12.  V.M. Rao Tummala, Cheryl L.M. Phillips and Melanie Johnson “ Assessing supply chain management success factors: a case study” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11/2 (2006) 179–192.  Victor H.Y. Lo and Alice Yeung “ Managing quality effectively in supply chain: a preliminary study” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 11/3 (2006) 208–215.  Victoria Bordonaba-Juste & Jesu´ s J. Cambra-Fierro “Managing supply a collaborative and chain in the context of SMEs: customized partnership with the suppliers as the key for success” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 14/5 (2009) 393–402.  Vijay R. Kannan And Keah Choon Tan “ The impact of operational quality: a supply chain view” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12/1 (2007) 14–19.  Vijay R. Kannan Keah Choon Tan “The impact of operational quality: a supply chain view” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 12/1 (2007) 14–19.  VijayR. Kannana; Keah Choon Tan “ Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance” Omega 33 (2005) 153 – 162  Xiaoming Li and Festus Olorunniwo “An exploration of reverse logistics practices in three companies” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 13/5 (2008) 381–386.
send me plz an email to provide u some the docs with a proper way
Our Service Charter
Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-FreeWe employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
Free RevisionsWe keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
Confidentiality / 100% No DisclosureWe make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
Money Back GuaranteeIf the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.
24/7 Customer SupportWe have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.