100% Original, Plagiarism Free, Tailored to your instructions

Order Now!


Researchers use different methods of data collection. The mode chosen depends on the type of data needed and the suitability of the data collection method. Each particular method in use has associated strengths and weaknesses. The most common interview methods are face-to-face, over the phone interview, video conference interview, email or by synchronous chat. The face-to-face model is advantageous in the sense that the researcher can review the questions in reference to a situation; seek clarity over a complex issue through paraphrasing or repeating the question. The researcher is also able to analyze the non verbal cues from the respondent and can effectively offer any assurance to the respondent on any sensitive answers. The model however has challenges such as geographical limitations, higher costs may be required to train interviewers and the respondent may not be cooperative due to absence of the element of anonymity (Biemer & Lyberg, 2003).
An interview over the phone is beneficial as among others it offers a wide geographical access, enabling the researcher to reach even difficult to reach populations. The phone interview helps access closed sites such as military, cults and dangerous or sensitive sites or talk to respondents who may be uncomfortable on face to face models. The challenges of this mode are absence of body language and social cues or the ability of the interviewer to create a favorable interview ambience. The use of video conferencing for interview saves on travelling costs, time and gives an opportunity to see and effectively communicate with respondents. Shortcomings include the lack of personal interaction and unavailability of the videoconferencing facilities (McDaniel & Gates, 1998).
The use of email and synchronous chat allows for access to wide range respondents. Background noises also do not interfere with communication since they are not recorded. The interviewer also has a chance to formulate the questions while the respondent can answer them at their own convenience. Access to amenities for this type of interview is a major challenge.
Part – B:
An interview was carried out to find appropriate answers on the following research topic: Partners or Competitors -The Impact of Regional Integration on Trade and Border Control in Central Africa: The Example of CEMAC (Monetary Economic Community of Central Africa) Member States.
A protocol was designed to seek answers from three respondents who I believe would be in a position to provide the information I was looking for. These respondents were drafted from different member states within the Monetary Economic Community of Central Africa.
Interview questions:
I interviewed a member of the executive secretariat of CEMAC located in Bangui (CAR) in charge of policy formulation.
Interviewer: Was formation of CEMAC customs union the necessary step in integration of central African economies? Would it benefit the citizens of the member states?
Respondent I: The decision to form the customs union was a reformative approach to enhance regional integration and improve on policy formulation with a special focus on creation of a common exchange rate among the member states. This would benefit all member state citizens to have unlimited access to a variety of goods and services as well as increased markets.
Interviewer: Has the implementation of the project been successful?
Respondent I: The implementation of the arranged protocols and policies by the member states can not be said to be entirely successful. The trade among the nations faces many hurdles. The competition among the nations as each strives to improve her own economy has led to complicated trade procedures with a number of nations (not to be mentioned) acting contrary to the agreed rules. The lack of political goodwill among member states is also to blame for the slow realization of the goals of the protocol (Wolf, Tsangarides & Martijin, 2006).
Interviewer: Do you think the CEMAC has facilitated competition or partnership in general?
I carried out another interview with an economic analyst on economic integration in Africa, who gave an honest opinion of his view of CEMAC.
Respondent II: The CEMAC was initially drafted to create a partnership from which benefits such as preferential access of their products to developed western countries would be accrued. Agreements such as Everything But Arms (EBA) with the European Union and AGOA with the United States have seen the bloc benefit from united negotiation powers. Intra-trade has also been enhanced among member states over the years but owing to poor policy implementation, slowly the bloc has created competitors instead of partners (Wolf, Tsangarides & Martijin, 2006).
Interviewer: what are the impacts of this integration on the political and trade patterns? Are there existing barriers to the successful integration of the member states? If there are, could you please give details on them?
The third respondent i sought was an economic scholar from Congo who explained vividly the challenges affecting the realization of the bloc’s goals.
Respondent III: the bloc has brought political stability within the region through concerted efforts by member states. This has in turn created room for increased trade and interaction among the citizens of the member states. Trade liberalization has led to competition and the enhanced quality development. The major challenges that have hampered partnership in CEMAC as expected of a regional economic bloc are many. It is unfortunate to note that even the executive secretariat has displayed a lack of authority and the necessary mechanisms to effectively run the affairs of the bloc (Geradin, 2004).
Secondly, the integration spirit seems to be lacking with all member states making efforts to protect their local industries from external competition. This is against the 2003 roadmap which sought to review the operation of all industries within the member states in line with the vision of integration.
Member states are faced with legislative and other manpower related challenges to fully participate in the integration. Chad for instance, is faced with training problems as she moves from using minimum price to transaction-based custom valuations. On the other hand, Gabon, has made attempts to train and even upgrade her custom regulations but claims to have faced major revenue setbacks hence delaying making the necessary modifications (Maruping, 2005).
By looking at the information i was looking for on the impact of the Regional Integration on Trade and Border Control in Central Africa, am convinced I got relevant data that would help me analyze the status of the bloc. The question on whether the bloc has facilitated partnership or competition was also answered from the information I collected from the three respondents. I clearly got to understand the challenges that could have made it difficult to realize the set objectives of the trade bloc.
The overall effectiveness of the interview questions and protocol developed was satisfactory. However; if I could have the questions strictly addressed to particular authorities who would give me unbiased information, the interview would be more authoritative. Furthermore I feel that open ended questions are open to wide interpretation that could deviate from the actually required answers. It would therefore be more effective if the interview questions are guided.
The process of developing and testing a data collection tool
            Data gathering involves use of appropriate instruments. Depending on the type of data, the researcher has to develop an appropriate tool and test its usability. The research tool is as important as data collection and requires maximum attention in development. First the topics of interest have to be carefully planned in relation to the research question. Incorporating experts’ advice in drafting the question designs helps in validating the coverage of data included in the tool. A researcher needs to conduct a literature search to compare with previously used methods. In designing a research tool, it is important to make it simple, easily acceptable by potential respondents and have an interpretable scoring system. The determination of the respondents’ level is vital to determine the choice of words and concepts to address depending on the respondents’ ability to answer. The tool should have an element of reliability. The research tool should show validity or the ability to give an accurate measurement of a concept under study. It should also be easily adaptable to unavoidable changes. The development process involves lengthy processes such as measuring attitude scales (Kelley, Clark, Brown. & John, 2003).
Testing the workability of the tool involves outlining the broad aspects of the data and compiling all the necessary items needed for the research. These are then analyzed in accordance with the demands of the research objectives. A pre-testing procedure is carried out in order to expose any weaknesses and make any necessary adjustments. Following the development and testing, the protocols to be followed in its application are specified. It is important to design an appropriate format to fit into the needs of the research, each section addressing specific or related traits of the problem under study. Developing and testing a research tool eliminates any doubts on the credibility of the results (Scholtes, Joiner & Streibel, 2003).

Our Service Charter

  1. Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free

    We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
  2. Free Revisions

    We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
  3. Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure

    We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
  4. Money Back Guarantee

    If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.
  5. 24/7 Customer Support

    We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.

Excellent Quality
Zero Plagiarism
Expert Writers

Instant Quote

Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency (Less urgent, less costly):
Total Cost: NaN

Get 10% Off on your 1st order!