Introduction
Educational technology may be defined as the study and ethical practice of encouraging learning and enhancing performance by making, utilizing and overseeing proper educational procedures and resources to enhance learning and performance in education and at work. The historical, social, and philosophical establishments of educational technology, alongside the theories related to it, can be considered. Constant technological improvements and the coming of multiculturalism have made educational technology an advancing issue. This paper addresses the contemporary issue in education.
History
Educational technology has advanced in unpredictability during recent years, from stereographs to radio, film, TV, PCs, and the Internet. In wartimes, technology expanded because of the testing of new educational practices. As the social, cultural, and technological needs of America changed, a move in theories happened. Overstated perspectives of technology’s benefits have prompted numerous cases of the disappointment of a few technologies to meet educational requirements or expectations. PC could be considered as an example in this case. In the 1985s, it was forecast that every student would have the utilization of his or her own PC by 1991.Money was an issue as well as non-user-friendly software (at that period). (Drake 2011).
Philosophical and Theoretical History
Educational technology is the best for students if the teacher understands his or her educational, philosophical convictions and their stance to those beliefs. A teacher’s belief framework is a vital beginning stage for getting the large portion of the utilization of educational technology. A teacher’s needs, qualities, and a general state of mind toward training and his or her students greatly affect that teacher’s practice. Varying sorts of educational tools are required for direction. With educational technology, the teacher must pick, build, and apply the apparatuses. From a Deweyan viewpoint, the request is not all cerebral in nature; it utilizes technology for its operation. A connection exists between the devices the teacher picks and the nature of the instructive experience of the understudy (Marshall, 2001).
The learning theories that went with the improvement of educational technology were behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism. Behaviorism concentrates on outward conduct that individuals learn through their condition. Cognitivism highlights thought, learning, and recognition. Cognitivism in educational technology is adjusted to investigation and change of the point into psychological undertakings, for example, diagnosing an issue or investigating. Constructivism concentrates on the learner’s capacity to build his or her insight. Online training is a case of a constructivist learning condition. Learners make their models comprehend what they are learning and what it implies (Tindall, Reid, and Glynn, 1983).
Social Influences
Societal changes and educational technology are interrelated. Women’s liberation, racial issues, free enterprise, the military, the media, mainstream culture, TV, and films have been factors in societal change and instructional innovation. Women’s activist perspectives of educational technology extend from negative to positive. A few feminists trust that technology is undermining to their cause since men are more well-suited to utilize and comprehend innovation, while different feminists trust that women can utilize technology to propel their causes and for strengthening (Knirk, and Gustafson, 2006).
Racial issues and instructional technology are an entangled review. Some trust that instructional technology is making awesome walks in multicultural training. Others contend that numerous underrepresented understudies don’t have consistent access to the regale of innovation (Drake, 2011).
Educational technology in education is a theme of genuine and productive research. One study tended to the speculation that K-12 teachers utilize instructional innovation for the most part for classroom management errands. The analysts noticed that technology courses as a rule taught in teacher educational programs don’t prepare teachers in the utilization of innovation in their classrooms. The author argued that those courses just show PC education capability. A poll was exhibited to a gathering of K-12 instructors from four rustic schools in Tennessee. In-administration teachers, totaling 168, finished the poll. The teachers referred to state innovation allow recipients, access to technology, and teachers PC self-adequacy as elements that prompted Educational technology to utilize (Han, Chae, and Kim, 2007)
Another article, by Knirk, and Gustafson (2006), investigated a structure for good K-12 educational technology. The reason for the article was to concentrate the thought of student’s interests in the moral issues that go with the utilization of technology in the classroom. The creators derived that the various needs and needs of students must be considered.
Educational technology and Multiculturalism
Educational technology keeps on advancing. Multicultural teaching and learning have taken a more noticeable position in the education group. The civil argument about the benefits of technology and its application in the classroom proceed. As indicated by Marshall (2001), in the United States, mechanical advance is the human advance, and that advance is the considerable equalizer of all. In additional Marshall (2001), contended that, even with the coming of multicultural education, the discussion preoccupies on sites and programming, as opposed to on the most proficient method to make access to technology more achievable to all students.
To make multiculturalism a staple in the classroom, Drake (2011), suggested that multicultural ideas be incorporated into the center technology courses for undergrad instructor training programs. Taking part in the Preparing Tomorrows Teachers to Use Technology (PT3) concede and after framing a value group, the researchers built up a composition that permits the multicultural substance to be effortlessly fused into the instructional, educational programs. The value group examined learner’s comprehension of different qualities and multiculturalism. Students in the technology courses were told to enhance learning utilizing technology and taught to incorporate it into their classes. When endeavoring to fuse technology, pre-benefit, and in-administration teachers should consider how the utilization of technology will affect assorted racial, ethnic, and social (Drake, 2011).
Recommendations for the Future of Educational technology
Proposals for the future utilization of instructional technology can be assessed from the inconceivable measure of research regarding the matter. Teachers of the youthful and of grown-ups must be prepared appropriately in the utilization of existing and rising advancements. This must be a progressing assignment. The joining of multicultural studies and its consideration in the educational plan by instructional innovation must proceed.
Conclusion
The study of the historical, social, and philosophical foundations of educational technology, and the theories related to its shape a base of which to track the advance of this important contemporary issue in education. Proceeded with technological advancements and the coming of multiculturalism have made educational technology an evolving issue, and the educational community must develop with it.
Appendix
https://www.google.com/search?q=contrasting+images+of+primary+school+teachers&espv=2&
Reference List
Anglin, G.J., 2011. Instructional technology: past, present, and future. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
Drake, H., 2011. Contemporary France. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Han, S.-K., Chae, J.-B. and Kim, H., 2007. Contemporary Education Issue: Interaction Tools. 2007 International Conference on Convergence Information Technology (ICCIT 2007).
Knirk, F.G. and Gustafson, K.L., 2006. Instructional technology: a systematic approach to education. New York ; Montréal: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Lever-Duffy, J., McDonald, J.B. and Mizell, A.P., 2003. Teaching and learning with technology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Marshall, P.L., 2001. Multicultural education and technology: perfect pair or odd couple? Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
Tindall, K., Reid, D. and Glynn, W., 1983. Instructional technology. Sydney: Audio Visual Unit, Sydney Institute of Education, Sydney College of Advanced Education.
Youngman, S., n.d. The Role of the Instructional Technology Coach in Improving ElementaryTeachers’ Perceived Ability to Meet the National Educational TechnologyStandards and Performance Indicators for Teachers.
Our Service Charter
-
Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-Free
We employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers. -
Free Revisions
We keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed. -
Confidentiality / 100% No Disclosure
We make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service. -
Money Back Guarantee
If the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit. -
24/7 Customer Support
We have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.