dentify one view your disagree with from our reading on objective morality or equality: Sartre, Ayer, Marshall, Singer, Anderson, or Kelly & Roedder. You may also write a paper about luck egalitarianism, if your disagreement with it is different from Anderson’s.
In 1250-1500 words (5-6 pages), (a) explain the view in the clearest way you can, (b) present the best objection you can to the view, and then (c) explain what you think would be the best response an advocate of the view could make to your objection.
Your objection and the response you consider must be different from any objections that were discussed in the readings or that I presented in lecture.
Your paper should be structured as follows: Begin with a short (i.e. 1-paragraph) introduction that explains your main view and how you’ll proceed. In Section 1, describe the view you’re discussing as clearly and concisely as possible, clarifying any important ambiguities or important pieces of jargon. In Section 2, present your novel objection to that view. Explain why you think that objection is a good one (and limit yourself to one objection). In Section 3, give what you think would be the best response to your objection. Explain why you think that response would be good. Use headings for your sections.
More specific directions:
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT ?