Change management is essential in today’s world (Orridge 2012). Every industry needs it, and the healthcare is not different. Ever-changing socio-economic environments necessitate various healthcare organizations’ adaptability in an organized, dependable, and stable manner (Todnem & Burnes 2013; Numerof & Abrams 2012). One such case is the recent shift from physician to patient-centred care, and, related to this, the emergence of value-based care in the United Kingdom. The shift is a monumental one for physicians and healthcare service providers. The UK government, through NICE (National Institute for Healthcare Excellence) and NHS (National Health Service), has made several attempts in the past to switch to value-based care. The previous attempts have been met with various levels of disapproval and failure. The newest attempt is RightCare, which is a system primarily aimed at “Reducing unwarranted variation to improve people’s health,” (NHS RightCare 2017). RightCare is set to be a permanent feature of healthcare systems in the future (Bach & Kessler 2012; Austin, Bentkover & Chait 2016). Organizations operating in the healthcare industry must adapt to the changing environment or risk irrelevance to offer quality services to their clients.
Change management, in such a case, requires a strategic approach. Hewitt-Taylor (2013) advises a discussion among stakeholders to set standards and ensure that fluid environment during the shift does not give room for lower standards. Such stakeholders include physicians, the UK Department of Health including NICE and NHS, health insurance providers, as well as consumer protection agencies (Sutherland 2013). Necessarily, the first step will be harmonizing human resource department operations within categories of stakeholders.
The introduction of RightCare has gone through numerous consultations. They have proven that the concept is viable since they have concrete facts from the few local healthcare economies they were working with. The aim of this is to create a situation where desirable outcomes that are observed from one institution can be applied with minimal changes to other organizations (McBride & Mustchin 2013). Costigliola (2012) and Martin (2012) agree to this, adding that regular consultations among the stakeholders will help in establishing best practices throughout a change period.
Change Management Models
Change management models that can be used by various actors in the healthcare industry include Kotter’s 8-step approach, McKinsey’s 7-S model, and Lewin’s change management plan (Ginter 2013). Each of these offers a unique practical approach to the problem, but they are all based on the same fundamental theory of step-by-step discrete approach. In this particular scenario, McKinsey’s model may not be of much use (Malan 2003; Inozu et al. 2011). The healthcare industry in the United States is immensely complex. If change management is conducted through this method, there is a very high likelihood of failure. The reason for this is that the model does not account for interrelations among the 7-S approach (Bingham & Main 2010; Hayes 2014). For instance, if insurance providers change their structures and systems, it will lead to a necessary change in hospitals’ and physicians’ strategies and management styles. Sutherland (2013) asserts that Lewin’s model is too ambiguous to be of much use in a healthcare setting. The shift from provider to patient-based healthcare is a vital evolution that should be managed as comprehensively as possible.
Kotter’s 8-step model seems to be the most ideal to the paradigm shift in the healthcare industry. One of its key strengths is that it focuses more on preparing people to accept change, which is a vital aspect of a healthcare system (Kotter 2012). Individuals tend to resist adjustments, and Kotter’s model directly addresses this issue. The result is that transition is simplified with the scheme. Grol et al. (2013) and Barr and Dowding (2015) agree, and further add that the model takes a lot of time since no steps can be skipped, and it addresses change acceptance, not the actual change itself. When managing change as large and significant as this, time is needed. The model provides for this as well.
Indeed, the model used by NHS England and NICE in implementing RightCare is a reinterpretation of Kotter’s model. They are making use of a twenty-step process to monitor and evaluate the progress being made on the country-wide rollout.
Several potential challenges have been identified concerning the shift from the conventional healthcare system to a value-based one. One such issue, as predicted by Suchman, Sluyter, and Williamson (2011), is in the integration of new practices into the operations of healthcare providers. Despite a majority of providers agreeing that value-based care is the future, many are facing significant problems in implementation. According to Antwi and Kale (2014) as well as Hertzog (2014), the implementation challenges that they face may lead to lower integration and absorption rates of new systems. Many of them claim that the main challenge is the lack of timely data. Effective data storage and analysis is a big problem when managing the change to patient-centred care (Murdoch 2013; Jain 2016). With all the information available, there is a dire need for people who can extract valuable information from it. Another data-related issue is its unstructured nature ICD-10 forms (filled at point-of-care) and the high error rates (Manyika et al. 2012).
Patient engagement is one of the biggest challenges to the transition. It is necessary for a transition of this magnitude to include consumers in every step of the way. If providers, insurance, and government systems are altered without including the consumer, then vital feedback on best practices is lost (Martin et al. 2012; Shirley 2011). Without the consumers’ acquiescence, the whole transition will collapse.
The transition that is occurring presently in the UK healthcare system is a vital one that will redefine this industry for decades to come. Thus, the change must be shepherded with the greatest of care. An appropriate model must be found on which to structure the change. The twenty-step process seems to be working well so far. In addition to this, potential barriers must be predicted and anticipated. The need for effective change management is evident. Change management provides sound theoretical foundations on which to build the newly evolved healthcare system. Without properly grounded change management, the enterprise is very likely to be a costly failure.
Antwi, M & Kale, M 2014, Change management in healthcare: Literature review. Monieson Centre for Business Research in Healthcare, Queen’s University.
Austin, J, Bentkover, J & Chait, L 2016, Leading strategic change in an era of healthcare transformation. Springer, New York City.
Bach, S & Kessler, I 2012, The Modernisation of the public services and employee relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Barr, J & Dowding, L 2015, Leadership in healthcare. SAGE Publications, the UK.
Bingham, D & Main, E K 2010, ‘Effective implementation strategies and tactics for leading change on maternity units’, The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 32-42.
Costigliola, V 2012, Healthcare overview: New perspectives. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
Ginter, P M 2013, The strategic management of health care organizations. John Wiley & Sons, NJ.
Grol, R, Wensing, M, Eccles, M & Davis, D 2013, Improving patient care: The implementation of change in health care. Wiley, NJ.
Hayes, J 2014, The theory and practice of change management. Palgrave Macmillan, the UK.
Hertzog, K 2014, ‘Value-based payment models: An opportunity for return on collaboration.’ Available from:
Hewitt-Taylor, J 2013, Understanding and managing change in healthcare: A step-by-step guide. Palgrave Macmillan, the UK.
Inozu, B, Chauncey, D, Kamataris, V & Mount, C 2011, Performance improvement for healthcare: Leading change with lean, six sigma, and constraints management. McGraw Hill Professional, New York.
Jain, S 2016, ‘One path to value-based care for academic health systems.’ Available from:
Kotter, J P 2012, Leading change. Harvard Business Press, Boston.
Malan, A 2003, Applying McKinsey’s 7S model within managed healthcare systems (MHS) to assess the organization’s effectiveness and ability to adapt. Rand Afrikaans University.
Manyika, J, Chui, M, Brown, B, Bughin, J, Dobbs, R, Roxburgh, C & Byers, A H 2012, ‘Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity.’ Available from:
Martin, G P 2012, ‘A critical account of the rise and spread of ‘leadership’: The case of UK healthcare.’ Social Science & Medicine, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 231-247.
Martin, G P, Weaver, S, Currie, G, Finn, R & McDonald, R 2012, ‘Innovation sustainability in challenging health-care contexts: Embedding clinically led change in routine practice.’ Health Services Management Research, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 190-199.
McBride, A & Mustchin, S 2013, ‘Crowded out? The capacity of HR to change healthcare work practices.’ The International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 24, no. 16.
Murdoch, T B & Detsky, A S 2013, ‘The inevitable application of big data to healthcare.’ The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 309, no. 13, pp. 1351-1352.
NHS RightCare 2017, ‘NHS RightCare.’ Available from:
Numerof, R E & Abrams, M 2012, Healthcare at a turning point: A roadmap for change. CRC Press, Florida.
Orridge, M 2009, Change leadership: Developing a change adept organization. Gower Publishing, the UK.
Shirley, D 2011, Project management for healthcare. CRC Press, Florida.
Suchman, A L, Sluyter, D J & Williamson, P R 2011, Leading change in healthcare: Transforming organizations using complexity, positive psychology and relationship-centred care. Radcliffe Publishing, the UK.
Sutherland, K 2013, ‘Applying Lewin’s change management theory to the implementation of bar-coded medication administration.’ Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 431-444.
Todnem, R & Burnes, B 2013, Organizational change, leadership and ethics: Leading organizations towards sustainability. Routledge, the UK.
Our Service Charter
Excellent Quality / 100% Plagiarism-FreeWe employ a number of measures to ensure top quality essays. The papers go through a system of quality control prior to delivery. We run plagiarism checks on each paper to ensure that they will be 100% plagiarism-free. So, only clean copies hit customers’ emails. We also never resell the papers completed by our writers. So, once it is checked using a plagiarism checker, the paper will be unique. Speaking of the academic writing standards, we will stick to the assignment brief given by the customer and assign the perfect writer. By saying “the perfect writer” we mean the one having an academic degree in the customer’s study field and positive feedback from other customers.
Free RevisionsWe keep the quality bar of all papers high. But in case you need some extra brilliance to the paper, here’s what to do. First of all, you can choose a top writer. It means that we will assign an expert with a degree in your subject. And secondly, you can rely on our editing services. Our editors will revise your papers, checking whether or not they comply with high standards of academic writing. In addition, editing entails adjusting content if it’s off the topic, adding more sources, refining the language style, and making sure the referencing style is followed.
Confidentiality / 100% No DisclosureWe make sure that clients’ personal data remains confidential and is not exploited for any purposes beyond those related to our services. We only ask you to provide us with the information that is required to produce the paper according to your writing needs. Please note that the payment info is protected as well. Feel free to refer to the support team for more information about our payment methods. The fact that you used our service is kept secret due to the advanced security standards. So, you can be sure that no one will find out that you got a paper from our writing service.
Money Back GuaranteeIf the writer doesn’t address all the questions on your assignment brief or the delivered paper appears to be off the topic, you can ask for a refund. Or, if it is applicable, you can opt in for free revision within 14-30 days, depending on your paper’s length. The revision or refund request should be sent within 14 days after delivery. The customer gets 100% money-back in case they haven't downloaded the paper. All approved refunds will be returned to the customer’s credit card or Bonus Balance in a form of store credit. Take a note that we will send an extra compensation if the customers goes with a store credit.
24/7 Customer SupportWe have a support team working 24/7 ready to give your issue concerning the order their immediate attention. If you have any questions about the ordering process, communication with the writer, payment options, feel free to join live chat. Be sure to get a fast response. They can also give you the exact price quote, taking into account the timing, desired academic level of the paper, and the number of pages.